View RSS Feed

SAMLAND

Disneyland's Alweg Monorail: Walt Disney's Highway In The Sky

Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
by , 06-01-2011 at 07:11 PM


One of the earliest sketches for Disneyland was Herb Ryman’s entrance to Tomorrowland that is framed by the organic shaped buildings on the left and right and the monorail hanging from a track. From the beginning, Walt was very interested in building a “highway in the sky” for his park.



In June 1958, Walt was on vacation with his wife Lillian. They visited the small mountain town of Wuppertal in Germany and, much to Walt’s delight, found a monorail train that had been operating for more than fifty years. The track rested on pylons built along the banks of a river. The train was suspended from the track and hung freely. It was similar to the one in the Tomorrowland drawing. As a rail fan with “high iron” in his blood, Walt had to go for a ride. Although Walt liked the ride, Lillian did not care for the way it swayed back and forth during the curves. She became ill.


Wuppertal, Germany

Later in the trip, Walt and Lillian were driving north along a major roadway near Cologne, Germany when a monorail train suddenly crossed over their heads. This monorail was very different from the one in Wuppertal. This train rode on top of steel-reinforced concrete beam. Walt was stunned. He wanted to learn more so he drove right to the administrative building to see what he could find out. He learned that the Alweg Corporation was testing the monorail. Alweg was owned and named after the wealthy Dr. Axel Wenner Gren. The company has been working on monorails since 1949. Walt was very excited to have found the idea behind his monorail for Disneyland. The success of this transportation system is a principle reason why Walt thought that EPCOT could work as a city.

Walt sent Joe Fowler and Roger Broggie to inspect the train and to report back. Both were impressed and felt it would fit right in at Disneyland. Joseph Corn said, “Being smaller than normal railroads, monorails would also lend a more human scale to the future.”

Roger Broggie and Bob Gurr modified the suspension technology so that the trains could climb the maximum grades and make it through tight turning radii. Not only did they want to showcase the technology but they also wanted to provide an interesting ride.

At first, the monorail trains where going to be built in Manheim, Germany. However, due to the time it would take to ship the trains to Disneyland and other issues, it was decided to have Standard Carriage Works in Los Angeles build the Mark I version. In order to speed up the manufacture of the Two Monorails, construction was soon moved toStage 3 of the Disney Studios. Gurr described the utilitarian German trains as a “loaf of bread,” and would significantly transform the ugly box into a streamline bullet-shaped rocket – not unlike the ones he remembered from Buck Rogers films as a child. As most things within Disneyland, the trains are 5/8th scale.



From Walt’s first sighting of the German monorail flying overhead while on vacation to the televised grand opening of the attraction with the Vice President of the United States (Richard Nixon) took less than one year. In that short time span the Imagineers engineered a functional suspension system, designed a beautiful train, installed the track, and tested the system so that it would be safe for the millions of passengers who would soon be riding. Imagine Disney trying to work on that timeline in this day and age.

Interestingly, it really was Walt’s personal monorail. Like the steam locomotives that circled the park, Walt personally owned these vehicles through his company, Retlaw. Perhaps you noticed that ‘Retlaw’ is ‘Walter’ spelled backwards. According to Michael Broggie, this arrangement allowed Walt to “put on his bib overalls and kerchief, and go wait for the next train. When the train arrived, [Walt] would climb into the cab and tell the engineer that he was on break.” Since everybody at Retlaw was on Walt’s own payroll they did as the boss told them.



The attraction opened on June 14, 1959 and was originally called the Disneyland Alweg Monorail System. The initial track was a winding .8-mile loop and became the first daily operating monorail in the western hemisphere. The Monorail also became the first to cross a public street in 1961 when the beamway was extended to a total length of 2.5 miles and a station was built at the Disneyland Hotel. With a second stop, the Monorail had transformed from ride to a full fledged transportation system.



Disney would continually upgrade the technology and soon the Mark II and Mark III versions of the monorail would come online. A major styling change would come in 1987 with the introduction of the Mark V model. Instead of looking like Buck Rodgers, the trains would resemble Gulfstream executive jets. In 2008, Disney introduced the retro-looking Mark VII model. The Disneyland system was granted a National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers in December 1986.


Art for the Mark IV Monorails

When Walt Disney World opened, they got their own exclusive trains called the Mark IV. These trains featured air conditioning, are wider and longer than the Disneyland trains. The Orlando trains would be upgraded to the Mark VI model in 1989.

Although Walt was always interested in a monorail for Tomorrowland, he may have also been motivated to one up a major competitor. In 1956, CBS and the Los Angeles Turf Club joined together on a $10 million project to redevelop Pacific Ocean Park in Santa Monica. They were inspired by the success of Disneyland. So the two companies hired set designers and ride system companies to develop a theme park over the ocean. The project was an immediate hit and more people visited Pacific Ocean Park in 1958 then went to Disneyland. Walt was never satisfied and knew his team could do something that would top the competition. “I can never stand still,” stated Walt. “I must explore and experiment.”

The Los Angeles region always had a thing for monorails. In 1953, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority’s (LAMTA) showed the alignment for a 45.7-mile route for a monorail from Long Beach to Panorama City along the Los Angeles River. The trains would have been suspended below the tracks like the ones in Germany.

An alternate plan was proposed in 1960, just one year after Walt’s demonstration model at Disneyland. This system would have covered 74.9 miles with 51 miles of beam overhead, 21.6 miles at grade, and 2.3 miles in tunnels. This system would have cost $529 million. This project was too ambitious and was scaled back to 22.7 miles with 12 miles in a subway under Wilshire Boulevard. The cost of the revised project would be $192 million. Monorail advocates argued that a side benefit to the project was the construction of a multi mile bomb shelter. Officials were so positive this would happen they held a public groundbreaking in Downtown Los Angeles and Beverly Hills in 1962. However, with no funding, the project went nowhere.



Along with Walt, author Ray Bradbury was also a big fan of the monorail technology. Bradbury tried to encourage the City of Los Angeles to build a system. He formed a citizen’s group called Save Rapid Transit and Improve Metropolitan Environments. He had admired the multi-modal and successful transit system in San Francisco and thought a layered system like that would work in Los Angeles. He said, “Look, the psychology of the monorail is what makes it superior. First of all, it’s not elevated like the old trains in Chicago. It’s up in the air, but it doesn’t make noise…you hardly hear it.” Bradbury added, “The important thing is that it’s above the traffic, and would glide past the traffic.”

The Alweg Monorail Company agreed with Bradbury on the merits of the technology and proposed a demonstration system for the City of Los Angeles. After the success of the system at Disneyland and the experienced gained at the 1962 Seattle Century 21 Exposition, Alweg was looking for a way to expand the business. So, on June 4, 1963, President of the Alweg Rapid Transit Systems, Sixten Holmquist, approached the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) and made them an offer.

The press release said, “We are pleased to submit this day a proposal to finance and construct an Alweg Monorail rapid transit system 43 miles in length, serving the San Fernando Valley, the Wilshire corridor, the San Bernardino corridor and downtown Los Angeles.” The offer was for “a turn-key proposal in which a group will share risk, finance the construction, and turn over to MTA a completed and operating system to be repaid from MTA revenues.” The budget for the initial monorail network, including rolling stock, was estimated to be $187.5 million. Alweg would also conduct feasibility studies for expansion of the system to cover the entire Los Angeles region. In an interview with the Los Angeles Times in 1965, Walt said, “A monorail would be a natural attraction to thousands of people who would just ride it because it is something new and different. And it is needed. It’s not something that would be scrapped after two years.” Another competitor proposed a 75 mile suspended car system at a cost of $182.3 million.

Both companies promised to build the systems for “free” in exchange for the next 40 years of passenger revenues to bond against. The offer meant that the Los Angeles region would have had the backbone of a revolutionary mass transit system for no cost to the taxpayers. Political pressure from the Standard Oil Company dampened the Board of Supervisors and the LAMTA enthusiasm for the project.

Bradbury said in 2001, “Telephone Alweg to accept their offer, made 30 years ago, to erect 12 crosstown monorails – free, gratis – if we let them run the traffic. I was there the afternoon our supervisors rejected that splendid offer, and I was thrown out of the meeting for making impolite noises. Remember, subways are for cold climes, snow and sleet in dead-winter London, Moscow or Toronto. Monorails are for high, free, open-air spirits, for our always-fair weather. Subways are Forest Lawn extensions. Let’s bury our dead MTA and get on with life.” To date, Los Angeles has spent billions of dollars to build 79 miles of fixed rail.

When Walt decided to build a city, he figured the Monorail would become the transportation backbone for the entire project. At Disneyland, Walt proved it could function reliably; provide a high level of service, and he wanted to integrate the technology into his city.



In Walt’s city of tomorrow, EPCOT, the monorail would connect all of the major destinations. It would start at the airport, then head north toward the Entrance Complex. The trains would pass through the Industrial Parks and enter the Transportation Lobby below the mixed-use Cosmopolitan Hotel. From there it would continue north and drop guests off at the Magic Kingdom. There may have been spur lines leading to the motel clusters or the low-density village projected for a later phase.

Walt’s mobility concept for his city was simple and designed to accommodate the realities of owning a car. He proposed that you allow residents and visitors to park their car once and provide a superior, attractive, efficient form of mass travel as an option. Guests, like water, are always on the search for the easiest path and Walt would have solved the problem of traffic congestion for his city.

We invite you to join Sam and MiceChat at the Huntington Gardens in July
“LOS ANGELES: INVENTED SPACES OR AUTHENTIC PLACES?”
Saturday, July 9, 2011 at the Huntington Library and Gardens

Presented by the Los Angeles Region Planning History Group in cooperation with the Huntington-USC Institute on California and the West Huntington Library and Gardens, Friends’ Hall Saturday, July 9, 2011 Coffee & Pastries: 9:30 a.m. Colloquium and Lunch: 10:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m.

The Los Angeles region has evolved as much from out-sized dreams and inventions as from traditional rules for establishing human settlements. Carey McWilliams called Los Angeles an “improbable” place not destined to succeed, but determined to do so. As Southern California developed, the visionaries who built this region knew it was less about location and more about destination. The enormous popularity of “invented” or themed destinations – Venice of America, Olvera Street, Disneyland, Third Street Promenade, CityWalk, The Grove and many others – has provided planners, designers and developers with inspiration and lessons on both success and failure. What is the difference between those places that have a “unifying vision” and those that celebrate a “messy vitality”? Where do “invented” places end and “authentic” places begin? In a land where set designers build houses, architects design movie sets, and many of our most cherished “public” spaces are privately owned and operated, anything is possible. A distinguished panel, moderated by author and planner Sam Gennawey, will address these questions.

  • David Sloane, Professor, USC School of Policy, Planning, and Development
  • Hassan Haghani, Community Development Director, City of Glendale
  • Vaughan Davies, Principal and Director of Urban Design, AECOM
  • Tim O’Day, O’Day and Associates
  • Neal Payton, Principal, Torti Gallas and Partners

Cost is $40; for students with valid student ID, $20

Fee includes coffee and pastries, lunch, parking, and day pass to the Huntington

Seating is limited; please RSVP to:
Alice Lepis, Secretary
[email protected] (preferred) or at 818.769.4179 no later than
Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Submit "Disneyland's Alweg Monorail: Walt Disney's Highway In The Sky" to Digg Submit "Disneyland's Alweg Monorail: Walt Disney's Highway In The Sky" to del.icio.us Submit "Disneyland's Alweg Monorail: Walt Disney's Highway In The Sky" to StumbleUpon Submit "Disneyland's Alweg Monorail: Walt Disney's Highway In The Sky" to Google

Comments

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
  1. mark's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    GREAT read! Thanks, Sam!
  2. lctom1's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    From Walt’s first sighting of the German monorail flying overhead while on vacation to the televised grand opening of the attraction with the Vice President of the United States (Richard Nixon) took less than one year. In that short time span the Imagineers engineered a functional suspension system, designed a beautiful train, installed the track, and tested the system so that it would be safe for the millions of passengers who would soon be riding. Imagine Disney trying to work on that timeline in this day and age.
    That, and the fact that Disneyland was essentially built in a time of only 12 months, still amazes me! There is no way that such large projects could ever be built so quickly today.
  3. Dadoo's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Why hasn't the city of L.A. addressed the Monorail system again? Where is the passion from the people of Disney to get this going again in a state that DESPERATELY needs an economic boost like the monorail? With California being so "environmentally conscious", it just seems ignorant for them to NOT partner with Disney to build a funcional and effective system like the monorail.
  4. villagecreator's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Quote Originally Posted by Dadoo
    With California being so "environmentally conscious", it just seems ignorant for them to NOT partner with Disney to build a funcional and effective system like the monorail.
    Not ignorant, but greedy. Oil and transportation unions have always had a large say in the government policies of Southern California. Just look at the fall of the redline cars. Los Angeles once had one of the greatest and most efficient transportation systems at that time, and we lost it. We are the only city in the world where you have to drive and park to get to the subway to take it the few miles it actually runs….


    Great article! Hope someone from government is reading this right now for some 21st century inspiration!
  5. Steve DeGaetano's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Oil and transportation unions have always had a large say in the government policies of Southern California. Just look at the fall of the redline cars.
    There really wasn't quite the conspiracy one imagines. What doomed the Red Cars wasn't greed or special interests or big oil. It was us. The automobile was simply too great a temptation for independent-minded Angelenos.

    In fact, the Pacific Electric had been converting to buses themselves for quite some time, petitioning to abandon rail line after rail line.

    People interested in the real story should read "Ride the Big Red Cars," by Spencer Crump.

    Great article as always Sam. Now, you mentioned Alweg and Disney, but who was the third sponsor?
    Updated 06-02-2011 at 08:57 AM by Steve DeGaetano
  6. Monorailred's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    LOVE monorail articles! Keep up the good work One small clarification - the Mark IV, V, and VI took their styling cues from the Learjet, not the Gulfstream.

    Third sponsor....Sante Fe Railroad...
  7. Disneykin Kid's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    What ever happened to the Alweg Company? The transportation system that intrigues me is the mag lev. Although I wonder if the magnets affect the body. I love the new DL Monorails, it's just too bad they can't have AC.
  8. jpg391's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    I believe that the Alweg Company went out of business several years ago.

    Very interesting story about the history of the Disneyland Monorail System. I used to live in Los Angeles and never heard that people wanted a monorail system back in the 60s. I am not surprised that big oil fought the idea even back then.
  9. MickeyMaxx's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Once again, Sam . . . Thanks!
  10. Director_Guy's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    The monorail is definitely something we need here. I wonder why it hasn't been brought up again.
  11. Jestyr's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Quote Originally Posted by jpg391
    I believe that the Alweg Company went out of business several years ago.

    Very interesting story about the history of the Disneyland Monorail System. I used to live in Los Angeles and never heard that people wanted a monorail system back in the 60s. I am not surprised that big oil fought the idea even back then.
    Alweg Archives Home Page
  12. Mousecat's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Quote Originally Posted by Dadoo
    Why hasn't the city of L.A. addressed the Monorail system again? Where is the passion from the people of Disney to get this going again in a state that DESPERATELY needs an economic boost like the monorail? With California being so "environmentally conscious", it just seems ignorant for them to NOT partner with Disney to build a funcional and effective system like the monorail.
    LA only knows how to waste transit dollars. But the salaries of those that run METRO are pretty good. Orange County tried to build an elevated train but was voted down. Disney was one of the major reasons why there is no high speed rail in Florida. That is one reason why Tomorrowland in CA looks almost retro and the one in Florida is really Pixar Fantasyland.

    Sam
    SamLand's Disney Adventures
  13. Mousecat's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve DeGaetano
    There really wasn't quite the conspiracy one imagines. What doomed the Red Cars wasn't greed or special interests or big oil. It was us. The automobile was simply too great a temptation for independent-minded Angelenos.

    In fact, the Pacific Electric had been converting to buses themselves for quite some time, petitioning to abandon rail line after rail line.

    People interested in the real story should read "Ride the Big Red Cars," by Spencer Crump.

    Great article as always Sam. Now, you mentioned Alweg and Disney, but who was the third sponsor?
    Coming from you Steve, I think that is a trick question and I will let you answer it. I know you know.

    From my research, what I think ultimately doomed the Red Cars was the original agreement that Henry Huntington would be responsible for maintaining the roads that provided the right of way for the trains. Not only did he have to maintain a transit system in changing times, but he had to repair the roadways for his major competitor. With declining ridership and much higher maintenance costs, it just made sense to get rid of the system.

    Thanks. Coming from you is an honor.

    Sam
    SamLand's Disney Adventures
  14. Mousecat's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Quote Originally Posted by Monorailred
    LOVE monorail articles! Keep up the good work One small clarification - the Mark IV, V, and VI took their styling cues from the Learjet, not the Gulfstream.

    Third sponsor....Sante Fe Railroad...
    I believe you are right and thank you. Good eye!

    Thanks for the great comments. One of my favorite memories about Disneyland is getting to sit next to the pilot in the bubble up on the top of the cab.

    Sam
    SamLand's Disney Adventures
    Updated 06-03-2011 at 05:17 AM by Dustysage
  15. Timekeeper's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Nice article.


    Timekeeper
  16. Koutesu's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Quote Originally Posted by Monorailred
    LOVE monorail articles! Keep up the good work One small clarification - the Mark IV, V, and VI took their styling cues from the Learjet, not the Gulfstream.

    Third sponsor....Sante Fe Railroad...
    The only known piece of the original Mark I Monorail Red has the Santa Fe logo on it.
  17. Not My Real Name's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Another under-the-track monorail is in France and it appears in Francois Truffaut's Fahrenheit 451, made in 1966.
  18. Marko50's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Loved this article! Thanx!
  19. Steve DeGaetano's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Quote Originally Posted by Mousecat
    From my research, what I think ultimately doomed the Red Cars was the original agreement that Henry Huntington would be responsible for maintaining the roads that provided the right of way for the trains. Not only did he have to maintain a transit system in changing times, but he had to repair the roadways for his major competitor. With declining ridership and much higher maintenance costs, it just made sense to get rid of the system.
    Actually, Huntington wasn't much involved in the Red Cars after about 1911, when the Southern Pacific bought up the majority stake in the operation.

    As a Los Angeles native, I'm well aware of how we love to romanticize the Big Red Cars of the mighty Pacific Electric. With over 1000 miles of track (more than the current freeway system!), you could go literally anywhere. On Sundays, you could ride all day for a dollar!

    The sad truth is, however, the PE never made money (except during the trafic boom of WWII). Cars did indeed kill the line. But it was because WE wanted those cars. Standard Oil and Goodyear didn't force us to drive. With cars came more roads, with more roads came more grade crossings for the PE; with more grade crossings came much lower Red Car speeds. Who wanted to sit in a sweltering Red Car stuck in downtown traffic when you could speed along in your own car on one of the new freeways?
  20. wonderpeep's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    LOVE this! Thank you. I am a huge fan of the Disneyland Monorail : )
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast