View RSS Feed

SAMLAND

From Slope to Nope - Walt Disney's Mineral King

Rating: 3 votes, 4.00 average.
by , 01-04-2012 at 08:38 PM


A few months ago I submitted this column about Walt Disney’s proposed Mineral King resort. This innovative mountain retreat would have been as important as Disneyland on urban design. Since the publication of that column I have been asked to host a presentation called Mineral King: Walt’s Lost Last Project at The Walt Disney Family Museum in San Francisco on January 21. Here is how the Museum has pitched it:


Urban Planner and Community Engagement Specialist Sam Gennawey (that’s me) hosts past Disney CEO and Museum Founder Ron Miller and architect David Price to discuss the innovative (and now-forgotten) year-round mountain resort that was one of Walt’s last major projects. This fascinating program gives context and detail to a remarkable and imaginative destination resort project that Walt assumed was a fait accompli upon his passing, and explains the forces and opposition that led to its ultimate abandonment. Illustrated with rare images, art, photos, archival documents, and film clips; this program offers insight into Walt’s vision at the height of his final career phase.
Mineral King is an amazing story, as you will see in this reprint. Werner Weiss at Yesterland also touched on the story just before the holidays and I recommend you read his report. What will be new at the presentation is quite a bit. The story will start way back to Walt’s initial love for skiing. Along the way we will meet some wonderful characters such as Hannes Schroll and Willy Schaeffler who got Walt interested in the sport. We will also learn about Walt’s first investment in a ski resort, Sugar Bowl near Truckee, and his growing interest in doing something even grander.The real red meat for Disney design junkies will be never seen before drawings of the proposed resort. We will learn from David Price AIA how the architecture and landscape were going to be integrated. This would not have been like any other resort. David is the son of Disney Legend Buzz Price.I will also dive into the landmark court case that was a result of this project. From an urban planning historian’s view, this may be one of the most important aspects of the entire event. Most importantly we will get to hear first hand accounts from Ron Miller. He worked with Walt on the 1960 Olympics and this was a project that was near and dear to his heart. I look forward to hearing those stories. So without further ado, here is the rise and fall of the Mineral King resort in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California.

Walt was frequently inspired by his trips abroad and brought back ideas that would be integrated into Disneyland and his other projects.

Walt took advantage of visiting the sets of his live action films when the production was on location. He seemed to enjoy his visits and it gave him a chance to travel, to observe, and to think. His imagination would be sparked on these trips and sometimes he would return with projects in mind. On one such trip, Walt was so inspired that he would bring back two incredible concepts for his Imagineers.

One idea would become a scale model of the famous Matterhorn Mountain and the other was a concept to reinvent the mountain tourist retreat.
In 1958, Walt went to Switzerland to see the progress on the film Third Man on the Mountain. The film crew was working in Zermatt, a ski town where automobiles were banned and you entered via a train. The resort had both winter and summer activities, a feat for most ski resorts at that time.

The operation folks at Disneyland thought a thrill ride would be a smart addition to the park and they tried to convince Walt that it was a good idea. Originally, the Casey Jr. Circus Train was going to be the first rollercoaster at Disneyland but that did not work out.

When the park opened, there was a big mountain of dirt next to Sleeping Beauty Castle called Holiday Hill. The hill was created by fill when they dug out the moat in front of the castle. By 1956, the tower for the Skyway gondola attraction would be built on this location. After his trip to Switzerland, he thought about how to use the space and wondered if he could reproduce a scale model version of the famous mountain and install a bobsled ride inside.

So his team went to work and built a 1/100
th scale model of the Matterhorn right next to Sleeping Beauty Castle. At the time of construction, the mountain was the largest structure in Orange County at 147 feet. Winding inside was the world’s first steel tube rollercoaster. This technology would change the amusement park business forever.

Walt’s trip to Switzerland reignited an interest in winter sports and he began to wonder how to make this activity more accessible.

Walt’s interest in winter sports lead to his role as Chairman
of Pageantry for the 1960 VIII Winter Olympics in Squaw Valley. He would be responsible for the opening and closing ceremonies. The ceremonies where a huge hit and Walt got to experience how to present the best entertainment experience in a winter weather conditions.He decided he wanted to build a mountain village that had all of the positive qualities of Zermatt but even better. As always, he turned to Buzz Price to look for possible locations.

The search for the perfect location for an all season mountain village began.

One of the first areas to get a serious look was on the north slope of Mt. San Gorgonio in Southern California. The mountain topped out at over 11,000 feet. It had a gigantic north face bowl. It was near Palm Springs and Walt’s vacation home at the Smoke Tree Ranch. However, the mountain was also a prime hiking location for the Boy Scouts of America.It would be a struggle so Walt decided to look elsewhere.

Walt was very close to a deal with the owners of the ski resort at Mammoth Mountain. Negotiations started with the Andrew Hurley who owned the resort and the McCoy family who managed the ski slopes. All of the parties were close to signing a deal when, at the last minute, the Mammoth Mountain people pulled out due to a lack of equity in the project.

Deep with the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California is a sliver of land surrounded on threes sides by the Sequoia National Park. That area is known as Mineral King. It began as a mining area in 1873 but went bust by 1882.

Over time, with the lack of activity, nature took its course and started to reclaim the valley. Mineral King was not included in the boundaries for Sequoia National Park in 1890. In 1908, the area was put under the jurisdiction of the United States Forest Service.
The Sequoia National Park boundaries were expanded in 1926 but Mineral King was left out due to the previous development activities. Instead, it became part of the Sequoia Game Refuge. Becoming part of the refuge would become an important detail later in this story.

The Mineral King area is about 15,000 acres. The resort area is located in an alpine terrain and at high altitude.

The Sierra Club was the first organization to recommend the area as suitable for a ski resort. The conditions were ideal. It had three huge bowls, five-mile runs, and a five-thousand-foot drop.

The area provided the State of California an opportunity to partner with the Federal Government to create a new winter recreational area. When Walt heard about this, he recognized that this was the type of challenge that he was looking for. He could apply what he had learned at Disneyland with his experiences at Zermatt and create a new type of mountain retreat. He saw this as a way to redefine our relationship to the wilderness and the project was very near to his heart.
Once again, Walt asked Buzz Price to study the opportunities presented by the Mineral King site.In 1965, Economic Research Associates (ERA), Buzz Price’s firm, was tasked with multiple studies to determine the Mineral King project’s viability. The project would have been a joint project between Disney and the United States Forest Service. The Federal government planned on leasing the land to Walt Disney Productions. The government’s expectation was development something along the lines of nearby Mammoth Mountain, Aspen, Colorado, Vail, Colorado, and Sun Valley, Idaho.

Walt Disney Productions was determined to design the Mineral King Resort as a family friendly destination with ice-skating, tobogganing, sleigh and dogsled rides. By targeting families, the resort would be set apart from other ski areas in California. The goals was to become a ski resort where skiing was not necessarily the primary activity for many visitors.



Attracting overnight family visitors was a high priority. One study showed that Mineral King was expected to have higher spending per capita than other ski resorts because of this orientation. Many years later, the Walt Disney Company would use this same strategy to enter the cruise line business. That arm of Disney has proven to be very successful.

Forecasters expected the population growth would remain incredibly high in the Southern California region and the demand for locally accessible recreational areas would be also remain high. Camping and skiing were recognized as growing recreational activities and since California had a lot of forests that held snow, this was considered a good thing for the State.

Mineral King was located in an area that would be very attractive to residents of Southern California. Although there are ski resorts in the San Bernardino Mountains near Los Angeles, Mineral King would really be a magnet for Southern California skiers since it had more reliable snowfall.

Initial projections claimed that the Disney resort would become as popular as Yosemite. Just like the theme parks, the resort could be closed to visitors if it got overcrowded.
Forecasters also thought the property would be attractive to out-of-state guests. Research has shown that a principal draw to California for out-of-state visitors is the Sierra Nevada Mountains, which are described as “a topographic feature not duplicated in mountain ranges east of the Rockies.” That is one reason why so many visitors are drawn to Yosemite and Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks.


Walt’s vision for the Mineral King resort would have created a unique development that would be unlike anything else that came before.

Ladd & Kelsey were selected as architects with Marvin Davis providing direction. The designer for the ski facilities was Willie Schaeffler who worked on the 1960 Squaw Valley Winter Olympics. He had proposed a trail system that used fourteen ski lifts.

Although the development of Mineral King was originally meant to address winter recreational needs, Walt’s vision would also have a full plate of activities to attract summer visitors. In fact, it was anticipated that 60 percent of visitors would come during the summer months and the resort would make more money during the summer than winter, which was unusual for a skiing destination.

The approach was to design a summer resort that had winter uses. For example, the ski lifts would operate in the summer and take people to trails and fishing lakes. Activities would be at all price points and would include cave exploring and wilderness lectures by Donald Duck.


There would be a showcase restaurant at the top of the lift where dances and entertainment would be held. Other attractions would include a conference center as well as Disneyland type attractions such as the Country Bear Jamboree, which was originally designed for the resort.

In a brochure, Walt said, “When we go into a new project, we believe in it all the way. That’s the way we feel about Mineral King. We have every faith that our plans will provide recreational opportunities for everyone. All of us promise that our effort now and in the future will be dedicated to making Mineral King grow to meet the ever-increasing public need. I guess you might say that it won’t ever be finished.

All of these activities would be contained in a high density, compact, pedestrian oriented village. The site plan was designed to minimize the impact on the surrounding valley. The three to four story buildings would be heavily themed and integrated into the environment. Guests would have felt like they have stepped into an Alpine village. The building would have been arranged to form a “Main Street” with protected plazas between the buildings.



The proposed resort would have two hotels, one deluxe and the other a moderate plus a dormitory. The original plans called for accommodations for 7,200 people, which would include Cast Member housing. There would be 2,400 beds within permanent structures with an additional 4,800 beds in temporary structures.

Throughout the village, the architecture would resemble Swiss chalets. There would be lots of pitched roofs, buildings with wide balconies, and all of the structures would be facing the “Main Street” at the zero lot line. This would have created a very intimate and welcoming space similar to Main Street USA at Disneyland.

To support all of these guests, the resort would feature up to ten restaurants that covered the entire price spectrum. There would be a wide variety of activities including horseback riding, tennis, and swimming. Other facilities included a hospital, a gas station, a chapel, a power station, and an ice skating rink.

Access to the resort would become an attraction in itself.

The proposal featured a unique way to access the resort as well. Automobile access would be limited and most guests would take a train from a large parking structure down in the valley. The train would crawl around the side of the mountain to a central station at the heart of the Mineral King resort. Once again, Walt was heavily influenced by his trip to Zermatt, Switzerland and how they dealt with automobile traffic.

Access to the resort was a big concern and ultimately one of the things that made the project unravel. Walt had ERA study the viability of a train. The methodology meant looking at attendance patterns at other National Parks. They considered a fee to enter the park by automobile as well as paying for a ticket to ride a train. Ideally, Walt preferred the train, which limited automobile access. The train would provide the highest revenues and have the least impact on the resort facilities. The train had other benefits. It would enhance the goal of more overnight visitors, as they tend to spend more money. Something like an old-fashioned Cog stream train would become an attraction in its own right. There was even talk about installing a Monorail system.

Much of the analysis regarding access was driven by the low capacity of the existing all season highway. The study looked at keeping the highway as an alternative way to enter the resort but it was determined that this would threaten the viability of the fixed rail system and cause other problems for the project.

The highway was annexed into Caltrans system, the state’s transportation agency, and a $30 million upgrade program was approved by the state legislature in 1965. The next step in the process would be to widen and straighten the access road. Approvals for the project and the roadway were in place by December 1967.

As the project moved along, Disney hoped to have the first phase of the resort open by 1973 and fully up to speed by 1976. The initial estimate for the project was $35 million. Beyond the transportation network and the construction of the village, other infrastructure costs included the construction of dams on the mountainside to prevent debris from washing down into the valley as well as a ten-story underground garage capable of holding 3,600 cars. The design for the project was considered so innovative that Walt and his team won an American Forestry Association award for “Outstanding Service in Conservation of American Resources” award in 1966.

The Sierra Club first identified Mineral King as a potential location for a ski resort but they would come out strongly against the Disney project.
Although it was the Sierra Club who first suggested that Mineral King would be an excellent place to put a ski resort, they did not favor the Disney project. They decided to come out against the project and sue the federal government. The Sierra Club attorneys argued that United States Forest Service did not follow its own rules with regards to lease terms. They reminded the court that roadways within National Parks and Forests were meant to be limited in size and not meant to be access roads from one destination to another. Since the access road had to cross through the National Park property before entering Mineral King, it technically did not fit within the rules.

The Sierra Club argued that the size and scope of the Disney proposal was not compatible with the goals of a national game refuge. Remember; back in 1926 the United States Forest Service annexed the Mineral King area into the Sequoia Game Refuge instead of the National Park.

When challenged, the Sierra Club argued it had standing before the court and asked, “then who speaks for the future generations for whose benefit Congress intended the fragile Sierra bowls and valleys to be preserved?” At first, that argument did not work and the Sierra Club lost on appeal. However, the case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court determined that the Sierra Club did not have standing before the court on this issue but the ruling also kept the door open to amend the lawsuit. So that is what the Sierra Club did. As the case dragged on, additional environmental studies were required and the project was scaled back by half.

As the two sides prepared to go to court, Disney claimed it would not pay for the roadway improvements and the state decided they would not pay for it either. After all of this effort, it was determined that the economics for Disney did not pencil out and Mineral King was annexed into the National Park in 1978.

Others we also critical of the Mineral King project and pleased to see its demise.

In
The Animated Man, Michael Barrier was also critical of the Mineral King project. He called it “a highly dubious use of a fragile valley.” Barrier cites comments from Peter Browning who felt that the project’s fatal flaw would be visitors who, “will make the trip simply because it is there to be made; it will be a nice-day jaunt.” Browning adds, “Many would not make the drive if there was nothing at the end of the road. He suggests that the major attraction was not the Mineral King Valley but that it was a Disney resort and that resort “could just as well be located in the Mojave Desert or Los Angeles.

Buzz Price would disagree with Barrier and Browning’s assessment. Price said, “Like everyone who had worked on this stunning project, we believed that Mineral King would have been the greatest winter resort in the world bar none.”Some key concepts from the Mineral King project would resurface many years later in an update to the National Park Service’s draft Yosemite Valley master plan released in November 2000. Walt wanted to reduce automobile traffic, encourage walking and bicycling opportunities, and minimize the impacts on sensitive natural habitats. The Yosemite Valley plan called for the construction of three new parking lots outside the Valley and a system of shuttle buses to bring in day guests. Overnight guests would still be able to drive to their accommodations but the amount of land dedicated to parking would be reduced from 1,600 parking stalls to 550. The plans also proposed the removal of a 3.2-mile section of Northside Drive, a major thoroughfare through the valley floor and replace it with a paved foot and bike trail. All in all, more than 180 acres would be restored to a natural state. Much of the 2000 plan has yet to be implemented due to significant reductions in the National Park’s operating budget.



EDITOR'S NOTE: We can't help but dream about a project such as this. Would the Mineral King concept have been a success if allowed to go forward? Should Disney have continued to look for alternate locations? Would you like to see Disney resurrect the Ski Resort project?




Please consider picking up a few copies of my new book . . . some to give and one to keep for yourself.
Walt and the Promise of Progress City is an amazing new book that explores how Walt Disney—the master of fiction—was determined to bring new life to the non-fiction world of city design and development and, in doing so, fundamentally improve the Great American way of life.Walt and the Promise of Progress City is available on Amazon $19.95 for the book version and $9.95 for the

Submit "From Slope to Nope - Walt Disney's Mineral King" to Digg Submit "From Slope to Nope - Walt Disney's Mineral King" to del.icio.us Submit "From Slope to Nope - Walt Disney's Mineral King" to StumbleUpon Submit "From Slope to Nope - Walt Disney's Mineral King" to Google

Updated 01-05-2012 at 11:20 AM by SAMLAND

Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. bamato's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    An excellent article! Thanks Sam!!
  2. SAMLAND's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Thanks. I plan on doing a follow-up on the additional information I have learned while preparing for the presentation. From a planning history perspective, this was a monumental project that has impact virtually everything we have done since.

    Sam
    SamLand's Disney Adventures
  3. Geographer's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Have you thought of having any of this published in the APA's Planning magazine? Much more interesting reading than current articles in that publication. Seems Walt was really on the cutting edge of the concept of sustainability in urban design. In that regard, he showed more foresight than the Sierra Club did (does?) who purports to be the superior in all things environmental. Seems to me, had the Sierra Club NOT opposed the project, we would be a lot further along in the evolution of enviornmentally sustainable urban design. Also, you should look into having your lectures certified for AICP Continuing Maintenance credits.
  4. SAMLAND's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Quote Originally Posted by Geographer
    Have you thought of having any of this published in the APA's Planning magazine? Much more interesting reading than current articles in that publication. Seems Walt was really on the cutting edge of the concept of sustainability in urban design. In that regard, he showed more foresight than the Sierra Club did (does?) who purports to be the superior in all things environmental. Seems to me, had the Sierra Club NOT opposed the project, we would be a lot further along in the evolution of enviornmentally sustainable urban design. Also, you should look into having your lectures certified for AICP Continuing Maintenance credits.
    I have to agree with you about the APA publication. This is an excellent suggestion. I have written for Planetizen before and I serve on the Board of Directors of the Los Angeles Region Planning History Group. What has started out as a hobby has turned into something a bit more. Thank you for the support.

    By the way, I will be giving one of the orientation tours at the National APA conference this spring.

    Sam
    SamLand's Disney Adventures
  5. themur's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Looking forward to the presentation on the 21st! Bought tickets weeks ago.
  6. DisWedWay's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Sam, In your Bear Band photo, that is Disney Legend Wathel Rodgers sitting on the left, Disney Legend Yale Gracey in middle, and Gary Younger standing on right, all programming the show. Great article. PD
  7. frankiefalzon's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Thanks Sam for the great article, I read the article about Mineral King in the last Walt Disney Family Museum newsletter and recently read your book. All these proposed places and advancements in urban design are very interesting.
  8. SAMLAND's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    DisWedWay I appreciate you calling out the crew working on the Country Bear Jamboree.
    I appreciate the comments.

    At the presentation, Buzz Price's son, David Price AIA, will be talking about the innovation site plan that tries to integrate the architecture within the landscape at a scale that has not really been done before. We have found some very cool drawings in the archives that will be on display for the very first time.

    By the way, I encourage everyone to Friend me at Facebook or twitter (samlanddisney) so I can provide updates. If you have read the book, I would be honored if you would post a review on Amazon.

    Thanks again,

    Sam Gennawey
    SamLand's Disney Adventures
  9. waltopia's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Absolutely fantastic work Samland. Looking forward to learning even more at the WDFM, and meeting you there. Hope they will have copies of your EPCOT book available to purchase in person. I trust updates are on your website too, as not all of us follow facebook.

    Thank you for shedding so much light on this topic. I was one of the many young California skiers awaiting the fabulous new natural Disney resort....and waiting and waiting, with knees getting too old to ski much anymore. Interesting to realize Walt thought it was a done deal when he departed. He had SO much going on and knew he was the guy to make things happen; the only guy as it turned out. Thanx.
    Updated 01-05-2012 at 03:36 PM by waltopia
  10. SAMLAND's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Quote Originally Posted by waltopia
    Absolutely fantastic work Samland. Looking forward to learning even more at the WDFM, and meeting you there. Hope they will have copies of your EPCOT book available to purchase in person. I trust updates are on your website too, as not all of us follow facebook.

    Thank you for shedding so much light on this topic. I was one of the many young California skiers awaiting the fabulous new natural Disney resort....and waiting and waiting, with knees getting too old to ski much anymore. Interesting to realize Walt thought it was a done deal when he departed. He had SO much going on and knew he was the guy to make things happen; the only guy as it turned out. Thanx.
    I do provide updates on my site and they will have my book for sale. I would be honored if I could sign your copy. For members only, there is a morning event with Jeff Kurtti and myself. The cost is $30 and includes a book from each of us. Should be fun.

    Sam
    SamLand's Disney Adventures
  11. waltopia's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Cool. Too bad I'll be driving up for the event that morning and thus miss the early one. That's a great deal too and good to know about. (Though likely I'd have any Kurti book already, as they are all excellent. Really looking forward to yours.) I am equally excited to hear from Ron Miller. Thanx again for putting all of this together.
  12. DisWedWay's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Hello Sam, I had no idea Mineral King was still active until 1978. Lake Independence, the 2nd choice, seemed to shut down in 1976 after than Govenor Jerry Brown came in for a look but did not offer aid against the Sierra Club, and Skier President Gerald Ford was not re-elected President that year over non skier Jimmey Carter. It's too bad Walt was not still around in 2005 when Mammoth Mountain came up for sale once more and Starwood purchased it. I'm sure they won't have a Country Bear Jamboree, or a Cog Railroad climbing the mountain to a revolving restaurant at the top. Your presentation should be very intereting. PD
  13. jedited's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    I would love for Disney to re-visit the ski resort concept. With DVC, it would make a ski resort project that much more profitable. But since Disney pulled out of the Washington DC project, I'm assuming that off property hotels are no longer in Disney's future. I always thought that a ski resort is a good pairing with a theme/amusement park since their high seasons are opposite of eachother.
  14. DisWedWay's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Sam, I was just reading how Walt Disney had taken skiing lessons at Yosemite in the 1930's from Hannes Schroll, who later named a mountain peak Mt. Disney at Sugar Bowl Ski Resort in California after him, as Walt was the first to contribute to the resorts opening in 1938 making him a stockholder. Just framed my 1970's"Mickey Mouse Ski Club" patch in Walt's Honor as a fellow skier. WED/WDI Graduate Architect David Ott, who besides doing Cinderella's Castle at Walt Disney World, last worked on the Paris Disneyland Castle before retiring. He used to talk about his work and interests on the Architecture for Mineral King and Lake Independence with great intensity. You know it would have had Walt's Magic with David's high level of detail. PD
    Updated 01-08-2012 at 06:48 PM by DisWedWay
  15. StevenSokulski's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Great article Sam! I never tire of this topic. The day-dreaming of Mineral King is just too much fun!

    Not to nag, but you might want to pass your articles around to a couple friends via email for a quick proofread before posting them up here. It'll make your already excellent updates that much better.
  16. SAMLAND's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Hello- Sam Here.

    I got this note from somebody and I thought that they make some very good points that are going to be part of a follow-up article. The research for the WDFM presentation will allow me to take a look at the Mineral King project through a different focus and it is a good story.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow
    Hello,

    I made an account for this purpose, but since this website never sent me a confirmation, I am unable to comment on the actual article. Lucky break for you, I suppose.

    First off, being a resident of the Mineral King Valley, it's interesting to hear the story from a Disney perspective. I realize that this is the "happiest place in cyberspace" (har har har) and you prefer to only look at the good side of things, but such strong bias is frankly unacceptable when you are dealing with real issues concerning conservation.

    I find it interesting that you completely failed to mention that the valley is home to dozens of historic cabins that would be completely demolished if a resort of such scale was built in the valley. The cabins date back to as early as 1890. By the 1970s, they had been enjoyed for decades by the families that built them. There are enormous amounts of personal history, tales, and culture involving the cabins and the mountain community, as you can well imagine. By building a ski resort, Disney would be forever separating numerous families from their favorite place in the world.

    You also didn't mention that one of the main reasons Disney didn't build was an avalanche that killed two workers hired by Disney and their dog. They had been sent to the valley in the winter to conduct snow studies, but were trapped inside the cabin they were staying in and suffocated from lack of oxygen. The avalanche also destroyed nearby buildings, and Disney realized that building in the area could be costly. Remember, grisly details such as this aren't suited to a place that sells happiness and fun, but they are NECESSARY when writing about it.

    You like going back to the fact (I presume it's a fact) that the Sierra Club had suggested a ski resort in the valley, but you don't mention that the purpose of the Sierra Club is to allow people to enjoy the outdoors. The planned Disney city wouldn't allow people to get closer to nature, it would demolish it. The included highway would destroy the face of the area, all along the 25 miles that it takes to get to the valley. Many of the fragile species that live in the area would be forever uprooted. Mineral King would become loud, dirty, and obnoxious (given the Disney characters that would be present). It's fun to only scratch the surface and continue worshiping Walt Disney and his corporation, but making an organization seem hypocritical without completely conveying the issue is immature.

    Thank you for your considerations. I hope that in the future, you learn to look at all sides of an issue. An update to your subscribers would be nice.
    Hello TheMoreYouKnow,

    Thank you for the note. I am disappointed that you could not share your views with other readers. I thought you made some wonderful points. Therefore, I am going to copy and publish your post and my response.

    This article was never meant to be the definitive history of Mineral King. It was meant to be a typical Samland article where I try to isolate and highlight the urban design patterns common to Disney projects. The subject of Mineral King is presented that way in my book.

    As you know, I will be at The Walt Disney Family Museum hosting a discussion on the project and I will get a chance to enhance and embellish what you have seen and tell a different story. A story that features many of the items that you mention in your note. Just as a tease, there is one exhibit that graphically makes your point to even the most Disney sympathetic audience. That is why I want to repost your note. It is an incredible story and those details are important. Those details are also the stuff of future Samland columns.

    Thank you,
    Sam