Ok, when WDS opened, let's just say it wasn't Disney's finest hour. Concrete, rubbish theme, bad layout. But good attractions. I was in WDS on my recent trip and was thinking, WDS has as many if not more of my favourite DLRP attractions than DLP. I mean think about it, Rock 'n' Roller Coaster, great ride, Cinemagique, intelligent and witty show, Armageddon, fun and scary despite a bloated pre-show, Stunt Show, spectacular. WDS has some amazing and high quality big attractions, so why couldn't Disney have just done what's around them a little better? The reason WDS didn't make an impression on anyone was not its good rides (granted not much for Kids but hey, I'm not a kid) but the way they did it, and surely if they could've churned out high quality original attractions like that, (R'n'RC, despite being a clone of sorts did that great DLRP 'let's do it a little differently' thing) they could've been as creative with the main stuff. The theme of a working studio isn't necessarily unworkable with if it's bustling and colourful, but it wasn't bustling because it wasn't colourful, both boxes are left unchecked. I'm not sure what this thread is really, but I just wanna say, WDS, in fairness, has some great attractions, especially now with Crush and the well-realised if overdone Cars, and of course ToT. It seems the ride dept. used their imaginations and the layout dept.'s. Anyhoo, uh, discuss.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks










Bookmarks