Chat Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

royaldisneyfan · 09-24-2008, 10:40 PM

I think that she should a permanent character at both parks. We are months from the release of the Enchanted DVD and of course there's the debate on whether she's a 'true' princess or not even though Disney is marketing her as a princess.

But she could be a great face character in her green 'curtain dress' walking around Fantasyland. What are your thoughts?

Dreamer20k · 09-24-2008, 10:42 PM

YES I DO.

But didn't Amy Adams sign something saying they couldn't use her in the parks?

aashee · 09-24-2008, 10:47 PM

I'm saying no. It'd be nice to have her for a few years but permanent, not so much.

SeaWolf38 · 09-24-2008, 10:48 PM

Idk.... it might not be too bad of an idea. If they're gonna keep the PPF around for a long while, she'd probably fit in there nicely. Maybe keep her out of parades for now, though.

Alice's Wonderland · 09-24-2008, 10:57 PM

In the curtain dress, not the wedding dress.

aaronpaulcustoms · 09-24-2008, 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dreamer20k

YES I DO.

But didn't Amy Adams sign something saying they couldn't use her in the parks?

maybe, but wouldnt the character be represented in the parks and not Amy Adams? Ehh its weird legal stuff i dont get

Sleepless Knight · 09-24-2008, 11:21 PM

Enchanted is tricky because animated Giselle is clearly based off Amy Adams. That brings up all sorts of legal issues(such as paying Adams royalties) when they use her "likeness" in the parks. I've read that they're not marketing Giselle as part of the princesses precisely because if they were to do so, they would have to pay Adams royalties.

Craigroy8287 · 09-24-2008, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alice's Wonderland

In the curtain dress, not the wedding dress.

I agree

wbarley · 09-24-2008, 11:49 PM

I've no idea of the legal issues, but I love Giselle and would be very happy to see her in the park, and also part of a parade where "That's How You Know" is performed.

DisneyIPresume · 09-24-2008, 11:52 PM

This will never happen. Amy Adams' contract with Disney is written up so that every time Giselle is in the park, she gets a royalty.

Gymnogyp · 09-25-2008, 12:22 AM

This has always bugged me...

Giselle IS NOT A PRINCESS!!!!

She never married the prince and at the beginning of the film she wasn't a princess.

MysticalSkye · 09-25-2008, 12:30 AM

I still think they should have Princess Nancy there.

MickeyMousePal · 09-25-2008, 12:31 AM

No, Giselle should stay away from the park.

Gymnogyp · 09-25-2008, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticalSkye

I still think they should have Princess Nancy there.

At least she's legit!

amanda.collishaw · 09-25-2008, 12:48 AM

Yeah Giselle isn't a princess, but she should still be represented somewhere in the park, Disney has enough money to pay Amy Adams royalties for her character to appear in the park. I think the whole Princess Nancy thing would be cute but I don't know if enough kids would pick up on who she was since she wasn't as big of a character of Giselle.

View Poll Results: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the Parks?
Yes	39	69.64%
No	17	30.36%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

09-24-2008, 10:40 PM	#1
royaldisneyfan Zack is the Cy Guy! Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Goin' to Kansas City. Kansas City Here I Come Posts: 2,909	Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks? I think that she should a permanent character at both parks. We are months from the release of the Enchanted DVD and of course there's the debate on whether she's a 'true' princess or not even though Disney is marketing her as a princess. But she could be a great face character in her green 'curtain dress' walking around Fantasyland. What are your thoughts? __________________ $"C:\Documents and Settings\martinla\My Documents\My Pictures\WINDVD Capture\cap014.jpg"$ *'It's me! I'm the bobblehead!'*

09-24-2008, 10:42 PM	#2
Dreamer20k Following the Second Star Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Neverland Posts: 1,273	Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks? YES I DO. But didn't Amy Adams sign something saying they couldn't use her in the parks? __________________ Cammie Dog: 3/27/05-6/28/09 God took you way too soon Protect your dog from heat stroke. It attacks and kills quickly.

09-24-2008, 10:47 PM	#3
aashee Chillin' with AshfordT Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Corona Posts: 49,348	Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks? I'm saying no. It'd be nice to have her for a few years but permanent, not so much.

09-24-2008, 10:48 PM	#4
SeaWolf38 Engine No. 173 Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Near the wrong theme park Posts: 1,449	Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks? Idk.... it might not be too bad of an idea. If they're gonna keep the PPF around for a long while, she'd probably fit in there nicely. Maybe keep her out of parades for now, though. __________________

09-24-2008, 10:57 PM	#5
Alice's Wonderland Directly directed Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Pacific Northwest Posts: 4,524	Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks? In the curtain dress, not the wedding dress. __________________

09-24-2008, 11:21 PM	#7
Sleepless Knight Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 202	Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks? Enchanted is tricky because animated Giselle is clearly based off Amy Adams. That brings up all sorts of legal issues(such as paying Adams royalties) when they use her "likeness" in the parks. I've read that they're not marketing Giselle as part of the princesses precisely because if they were to do so, they would have to pay Adams royalties.

09-24-2008, 11:52 PM	#10
DisneyIPresume Beach Expert Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: A beach town that Harbor Blvd was named after Posts: 7,687	Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks? This will never happen. Amy Adams' contract with Disney is written up so that every time Giselle is in the park, she gets a royalty.

09-25-2008, 12:22 AM	#11
Gymnogyp Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 146	Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks? This has always bugged me... *Giselle IS NOT* A PRINCESS!!!!** She never married the prince and at the beginning of the film she wasn't a princess. __________________ http://dlrtoday.com

09-25-2008, 12:30 AM	#12
MysticalSkye The Pirate Girl Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: In the Field of Bakers or in the mountains of Arizona. Posts: 320	Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks? I still think they should have Princess Nancy there. __________________ For certain you must be lost to find the places that can't be found. Elseways, everyone would know where it was.

09-25-2008, 12:31 AM	#13
MickeyMousePal Lanterns War??? Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Black Lantern RISE!!! Posts: 24,019	Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks? No, Giselle should stay away from the park.

09-25-2008, 12:48 AM	#15
amanda.collishaw ... Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Orangevale Posts: 6,596	Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks? Yeah Giselle isn't a princess, but she should still be represented somewhere in the park, Disney has enough money to pay Amy Adams royalties for her character to appear in the park. I think the whole Princess Nancy thing would be cute but I don't know if enough kids would pick up on who she was since she wasn't as big of a character of Giselle. __________________ "Of course, I’ll always love you… in a way."

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Bolt character in the parks?	MooglePower	Disneyland Resort	11	12-18-2008 02:48 AM
When Did Robert Fall in Love with Giselle	Witches of Morva	Disney Business	18	12-02-2007 02:50 PM
Any Giselle Sightings?	Witches of Morva	Walt Disney World Resort	14	11-25-2007 10:41 AM
Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Online Announces Millionth Character Milestone	Darkbeer	News	0	02-28-2006 03:19 PM