It's a fair point...but...I do wonder about a couple of things:
Originally Posted by techskip
a) If $172M (assuming it's accurate) really went to WDI, or whether it includes things like marketing expense or corporate overhead.
b) How much better WDI would perform if:
1) They were given absolutely firm budgets, as opposed to numbers that get continuously lowered by corporate bean counters
2) They were allowed to work without executive interference during the entire development process.