Not that we'll ever know, but there is another issue: the rings of June and September are different, indicating two marriages if they indicate marriage. Is he really telling us this gal married twice, and neither time got anything like a traditional diamond wedding ring? Also, June does not look like the marrying type. On the other hand, I don't know if Victorian women (especially ones with a risqué attitude) wore non-nuptial rings on that finger. Sort of an unmarried ring.