LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksLOLing at Laxidazia planet of alcoholic trolls what???
LOLing at Laxidazia planet of alcoholic trolls what???
link-a-dinks:
TUMBLR @ryanpchavez YOUTUBE
Thats how they roll in Marvel yo!
In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read. But the bitter truth we critics must face, is that in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so.
That's the point everyone is trying to make. The areas don't necessarily have to be so narrowly thought out.Originally Posted by JerrodDRagon
---------- Post added 06-28-2012 at 04:57 PM ----------
The new Mad T Party!
I don't know, I guess I just don't like Marvel enough to have a whole park to itself. But I guess that doesn't mean it can't be great! Opinions can be changed easily. I mean I liked living in California a lot but then DCA was built...
link-a-dinks:
TUMBLR @ryanpchavez YOUTUBE
No they are saying make area's from Marvel lands...which have histoy's too them and then try to find other things to fit theme
I'm saying make lands that have a theme (Fantasy)...that allows for many different types of rides to work, you can make Wakanda but then you can have things that are not in that land's History whille....Mystic Jungle allows for almost ANY ride with a jungle theme to work
[/U]
That's the core beef anyone has with this concept. I am not a Marvel fan, I dot read comic books, but it's been an undeniable part of pop culture for YEARS.
do you think its possible that Disney would abandoned the idea of Lands for Marvel. Make like an overall adventure park and avoid the thematic issue of lands?
In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read. But the bitter truth we critics must face, is that in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so.
Those are all Disney properties, yet they're all different stories. Not all Marvel properties are the same story. Anything you say about Disney like this can be applied to Marvel and still hold true.
"If theme parks, with their pasteboard main streets, reek of a bland, safe, homogenized, whitebread America, the Renaissance Faire is at the other end of the social spectrum, a whiff of the occult, a flash of danger and a hint of the erotic. Here, they let you throw axes. Here are more beer and bosoms than you'll find in all of Disney World." - Chicago journalist Neil Steinberg
Then what would be be the point of making a land based off Marvel...if it is not the same place?
Look at Carsland it's yes but to say its got as much freedom to do what ever ride you want is...well not true
Why even make make a Marvel land if you have to bend the laws/history of the place to fit other places in it?
Just make a Mavel land go nuts...and let Disney fans get there share of the park too...like I said I see no reason to make an "all" Marvel park but I do see a reason for a new park that one of its main features are Marvel attractions
The point that I'm trying to make. You can creates worlds and implement the marvel characters at they see fit. I'm not asking for Asgardland or wakandaland. But if you did a galaxy themed land you could do everything from Thor to Thanos to Galactus to silver surfer and everything in between. THAT'S the kind of Marvel Universe Park I want to see
"If you were thinking, you wouldn't have thought that"
You don't have to. All of these locations exist in the Marvel universe simultaneously.
Disney fans have a park, its called Disneyland. Marvel was purchased to appeal to people who may not like Disney as it is currently
"If theme parks, with their pasteboard main streets, reek of a bland, safe, homogenized, whitebread America, the Renaissance Faire is at the other end of the social spectrum, a whiff of the occult, a flash of danger and a hint of the erotic. Here, they let you throw axes. Here are more beer and bosoms than you'll find in all of Disney World." - Chicago journalist Neil Steinberg
No they were purchased to be used with Disney...like Pixar
No need to separate them
I could go more for this....I just don't want lands that limit who "should" be in the land....I just don't want to see lands that Mix and match characters like how Tommorrowland feels right now
LOL. Let me get this straight.
Your first statement says that Disney should be blended with Marvel, like Pixar is.
Your second statement says that you DON'T want to see another Tomorrowland, with a blend of Pixar/Disney characters.
Carsland is blended into the parks RIGHT...so is toy Story (on the Pier) I want to see it done right, which Disney has done beforeLOL. Let me get this straight.
Your first statement says that Disney should be blended with Marvel, like Pixar is.
Your second statement says that you DON'T want to see another Tomorrowland, with a blend of Pixar/Disney characters.
I think a just Marvel park can work but I also think a park with Marvel, TRON, Avatar, the Incredibles and others seems interesting. It could be a Heros park.
But if there is a TRON land it needs to be in a giant show room.
Murphy,with that neck, is like E.T. in dragon form
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks