LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksWhy does putting Iron Man in Tomorrowland preclude the possibility of a Marvel park or use of Marvel in a 3rd park? Or why must a 3rd park be a Marvel park at all?Originally Posted by Bob Weaver
Why does putting Iron Man in Tomorrowland preclude the possibility of a Marvel park or use of Marvel in a 3rd park? Or why must a 3rd park be a Marvel park at all?
Our revels now are ended. These our actors, As I foretold you, were all spirits and Are melted into air, into thin air: And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, The cloud-capp'd towers, the gorgeous palaces, The solemn temples, the great globe itself, Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff As dreams are made on, and our little life Is rounded with a sleep. mycroft16 on Twitter
Well judging by the post this new e ticket one of a kind ride shouldn't have a long wait since half if not more of you will not be riding it. Makes the wait time better for me.
"I love Mickey Mouse more than any woman I have ever known."-Walt Disney
Hope I was helpful!
I don't know if they are still doing surveys or how it can affect this ride but you can try to find a survey taker at the park and answer the questions on Tomorrowland. This is one way to express your opinions on the land. Here is a thread I made over a week ago. http://micechat.com/forums/disneyland-resort/174617-surveys-tomorrowland.html
Murphy,with that neck, is like E.T. in dragon form
Perfect! It is a way for everyone to let them know what a great idea this is.
"You can cut me off from the civilized world. You can incarcerate me with two moronic cellmates. You can torture me with your thrice daily swill, but you cannot break the spirit of a Winchester. My voice shall be heard from this wilderness and I shall be delivered from this fetid and festering sewer."
In that case Disney will shut it down due to lack of popularity.
^or they will scrap this idea and leave innoventions for another 5+ years...
---------- Post added 10-17-2012 at 11:53 PM ----------
Then we will be stuck with universal and their marvel rides. The irony!!!
"I love Mickey Mouse more than any woman I have ever known."-Walt Disney
Hope I was helpful!
Have you ever watched the original Mickey Mouse cartoons. The ones where Walt actually did the voice. The ones where he was still his original character: the mischievous, troublemaking trickster who performed quite macabre pranks on the other characters. Or the original Donald Duck: who was petty, selfish, vindictive and quick to anger?
The need for modern Disney to soften the edge of its characters in the name of family wholesomeness is infuriating. This is the type of stuff late-era Walt pulled in his animation that lost him all of his artistic credibility. It broke the very edict early Walt abided by: to not disrespect his younger audience by dumbing down or sugar-coating the work.
Tony Stark is a drunken, egotistical, arrogant (and I would add stubborn) character. Show him as a drunken, egotistical, arrogant, stubborn character. Don't insult your audience, thinking they can't handle it. They can, the kids will be alright.
For everybody thinking this might be a big budget type of ride, here is something to chew on
from Jay Rasulo and Bob Iger:
As it opens new attraction, Disney prepares to cut capital spending
But it also marks the crest of a $6 billion wave of capital spending across Disney's U.S. theme-park and resort holdings. And senior Disney executives now vow to cut back.
"We should be coming down substantially — substantially — in domestic spending," Disney Chief Financial Officer Jay Rasulo said during a recent presentation to stock analysts.
"We don't have any other big projects right now" in the U.S., Disney President and Chief Executive Officer Bob Iger said during a separate presentation. The lone exception, Iger added, is a "land" planned for Disney's Animal Kingdom based on the movie"Avatar,"which isn't expected to open until at least 2016.
Doctor: We're too exposed everywhere. And Amy can't move. And besides, that's not the plan.
River: There's a plan?
Doctor: I don't know. I haven't finished talking yet.
So because the basic foundation of Pirates and Haunted Mansion use existing themes in history means that they are unoriginal? Give me a break... You are totally glazing over the fact that the characters, story, setting, music composition, ride system, technology, and art are all original in full. Your statement is quite honestly laughable if you think that trying to purposely diminish the revolutionary achievements of WED will make Stark Expo seem any better than the uncreative, lazy, and greedy concept that it is. Just because you have given up fighting for Disney's values and want to compromise, doesn't mean all of us want to. I find what Walt Disney bestowed upon us to be priceless, I refuse to see it destroyed for a cheap thrill or short-term profit boost.
Last edited by Seawolf; 10-18-2012 at 03:37 AM.
Well, I guess I should have said it "appealed" to great intellectual minds of the time, as well as kids and families.
Unfortunately, the place has been so dumbed-down to appeal to a mass audience that this is no longer the case.
Nothing comes from nothing. Nothing ever could.
So somewhere in my youth or childhood I must have done something good.
I'm just glad it's not Lone Ranger. I was dreading another attraction with Depp around every corner.
I'm just a purist and I think a land should have a clearly defined theme and the attractions in that land should be related to that theme. And I see Tomorrowland, which long ago had a theme as defined by Walt Disney, as having lost the theme and now being just a collection of miscellaneous attractions. And the addition of another attraction, unrelated to any of the others, is simply a continuation of that trend. I would rather see them pick a theme for the land and unify it so that the attractions are related to it, at least tangentially, and unify the look and feel of the land so that when you are there you really feel like you are in it and you are living that theme. Tomorrowland no longer has that feeling.
I'm also a purist in that I don't like having non-Disney films encroaching on Disneyland and I'm still against the idea of the Star Wars and Indiana Jones films being represented within Disneyland as they were not made by Disney and not owned by Disney. As far as the third park, I think there is still a perception that Disneyland is primarily for kids. A friend of mine refuses to go there, saying "Disneyland is for under 8 and over 80" but he will happily go to Magic Mountain. So for a third park I think Disney really needs to focus on that market they may be missing out on, teenagers and young adults that seek big thrills and action and the Marvel brand fits that better than the Disney or Pixar brands do.
Ah, but two Wright's make a plane!!
As a comic book reader, I am still not super stoked. I am biased though, I love DC and am not a huge Marvel fan (BTW the New 52 Aquaman is fantastic!).
Sorry, that just isn't going to happen..
It looks like he was talking about entire new lands being built, not individual rides. Even if the design team would be given free rein with this one, it wouldn't be the same large-scale budget that was given to Cars Land or the expanded Fantasyland.
"You can cut me off from the civilized world. You can incarcerate me with two moronic cellmates. You can torture me with your thrice daily swill, but you cannot break the spirit of a Winchester. My voice shall be heard from this wilderness and I shall be delivered from this fetid and festering sewer."
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks