Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
  1. #1

    • Member
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    239

    California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    Interesting for Disneyland, no? For those of you following amusement park law and "common carrier" requirements...

    Ruling over bumper-car injury supports amusement park - latimes.com

    Ruling over bumper-car injury supports amusement park

    The California Supreme Court says riders can't sue over injuries stemming from the inherent nature of the attraction. 'Those who voluntarily join in these activities also voluntarily take on their minor inherent risks,' the court says.

  2. #2

    • Senior Monorail Minion
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Not sure, but we have a big mouse in town ;)
    Posts
    1,499

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    Now they need to rule if attractions such as Autopia are considered "bumper cars"
    WELCOME ABOARD
    THE DISNEYLAND MONORAIL SYSTEM!


  3. #3

    • Parking Lot > DCA
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,375

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    That is seriously so awesome.

  4. #4

    • Minion
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Salt Lake
    Posts
    1,951

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric5675 View Post
    Now they need to rule if attractions such as Autopia are considered "bumper cars"
    Seeing as how the ride says no bumping i would assume that would be a no. The question here is if injured due to being slamed into on autopia who is at fault? Driver (my choice) or the company?
    BGood! It's not just my motto its my name!

  5. #5

    • "I Break Things"
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    12,370

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    sadly people will continue to sue and Disney will continue to settle so as to avoid the bad press. Only a fraction of the suits make it to court and those are ones the company tried to settle but the client refused.
    "Happiness is a Low Water Level"


    "Creating magical memories and making Managers cry since 1955!"


  6. #6

    • Seeker of Fun
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Northern CA
    Posts
    1,353

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    Pathetic lawsuits! Glad they actually got this right.
    Stockholder and Walt Disney Autograph holder!!

  7. #7

    • The Tomorrowland One
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Disneyland
    Posts
    722

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric5675 View Post
    Now they need to rule if attractions such as Autopia are considered "bumper cars"
    The nature of the opinion and ruling already cover rides like Autopia. Attractions where the guest relinquishes control (ie, Indy, Splash, PotC, etc.) are still held to Disney if they are injured. Attractions where others are in control (Auto, Tuck n Roll, maybe Teacups) are they now protected from being sued over injury that was not their fault. You could still sue them ovr Auto if you car somehow caught on fire and you were injured as a result. Not that the cars should ever catch on fire...

  8. #8

    • New Member
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    14

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    Quote Originally Posted by Autopia View Post
    The nature of the opinion and ruling already cover rides like Autopia. Attractions where the guest relinquishes control (ie, Indy, Splash, PotC, etc.) are still held to Disney if they are injured. Attractions where others are in control (Auto, Tuck n Roll, maybe Teacups) are they now protected from being sued over injury that was not their fault. You could still sue them ovr Auto if you car somehow caught on fire and you were injured as a result. Not that the cars should ever catch on fire...
    What if your car catches fire and then you get bumped from behind?





    Kidding

  9. #9

    • Member
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    1845 Sugarcube Ln., Ponyville, Equestria
    Posts
    570

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    Quote Originally Posted by Brandy Lee Zabodyn View Post
    What if your car catches fire and then you get bumped from behind?
    Stop vehicle, get out of vehicle, remove vehicle from road's rail, move to side of road, turn on emergency flashing lights, call for tow truck. Problem solved.

    On a more serious note, I will sell all my belongings in the world and alternate dimensions of this world to everyone in the world when everybody learns to take responsibility for their safety since it is not always the park's fault for injuries.



    Total Tender Rides: 20
    Total Lilly Belle Rides: 9
    Total Dapper Days Attended: 2
    Total Mark Twain Wheelhouse Rides: 5

  10. #10

    • Member
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    374

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    Maybe this means OSHA will dry up and go away now. There have been many stupid things lately, but nothing has been stupider than the discovery, after 50 years, that Alice in Wonderland doesn't have railings and needs them for safety.

  11. #11

    • Member
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Nor Cal
    Posts
    1,187

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    Victory for common sense and huge defeat for dumb people!
    The Mur
    ______________________________________________
    Two different worlds.....we live in two different worlds

  12. #12

    • No Disassemble!
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    793

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    I hope this means that Tuck and Roll's Buggies will get some more horsepower.
    Many Bothans died to bring you these fastpasses.

  13. #13

    • Senior Minion
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Splash Mountain
    Posts
    7,962
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    So can we finally make the crappy bumper cars in Bugs land move more then 1 mile an hour?

  14. #14

    •   
    • Banned User
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    752

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    LOL @ this quote from the plaintiff attorney:

    "Patrons are less safe today than they were yesterday," Rosenberg said.

    Well hell, now I need to avoid theme parks because they're filled with as many explosions as an episode of the A-Team. It wasn't like that yesterday.



    Quote Originally Posted by EC82 View Post
    Maybe this means OSHA will dry up and go away now. There have been many stupid things lately, but nothing has been stupider than the discovery, after 50 years, that Alice in Wonderland doesn't have railings and needs them for safety.
    AGREED!

  15. #15

    • -
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Uijeongbu
    Posts
    6,609

    Re: California Supreme Court and Amusement Parks - LA Times article

    Quote Originally Posted by EC82 View Post
    nothing has been stupider than the discovery, after 50 years, that Alice in Wonderland doesn't have railings and needs them for safety.
    Actually there have been claims from workers that it was a little nerve racking walking that vine with no railing, especially if it was wet. OSHA isn't to blame for the way the vine looks now. Lack of creativity at Disney is to blame.
    "You can cut me off from the civilized world. You can incarcerate me with two moronic cellmates. You can torture me with your thrice daily swill, but you cannot break the spirit of a Winchester. My voice shall be heard from this wilderness and I shall be delivered from this fetid and festering sewer."

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-14-2007, 07:03 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-21-2005, 04:42 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-16-2005, 10:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •