Originally Posted by Loomis
No it isn't Walt's park any more, and that's not a bad thing. His own vision was that "Disneyland will never be completed..." and if he were to suddenly come back, I think he'd be disappointed if the park he built hadn't changed in 50 years. Indeed, he be very disappointed - as chances are that the place wouldn't be running any more if it was the same park from the 1950s and 1960s.
The beauty of Disney rides is that they inform, and are informed BY, popular culture. Pirates has become a definite part of the popular consciousness, and this was partly the reason for the success of the film. Consequently, the subsequent movie has now informed the ride. I can't think of a more symbiotic relationship than that one. It would be completely foolish of Disney to ignore the success of the movie in the ride. Besides, Eisner added the "Curse of the Black Pearl" to the title, simply so that people wouldn't immediately associate the movie and the film. I thought theme park enthusiasts would be happy that Disney recognises how intertwined the relationship between the two is.
Walt's park is gone. Long live Walt's park. Walt's park didn't have a Splash Mountain, it didn't have Star Tours, Indiana Jones, Space Mountain or Big Thunder Mountain. However, I doubt you would find many Disneyland fans that would think the park was better off without them. Change is inevitable, and if that list is any guide, it is a good thing. Walt's park remains alive here, but his vision of a park that would be popular with children of ALL generations only remains alive through constant change.
Besides, on the 100th anniversary, when Jack Sparrow is being removed for the Hollywood remake of Pirates of the Caribbean (we know it's inevitable), there will be the equivalent of netizens having this very conversation. Frankly, that fills me with a great sense of joy.