Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31
  1. #1

    • Ursus H. Bear, ESQ
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    341

    Filling in 20,000 Leagues a mistake?

    I just thought of it....

    I was kind of happy and self assured that WE (ie Disneylanders) would not only be keeping our subs but getting a (hopefully) cool Nemo overlay where WDW just had their lagoon shuttered and filled in, HA!

    But then it hit me, what if the new Nemo theme is really cool, and it does really well over here...and they decided that it would be a good thing to bring over to WDW...they just filled in the most pefect location for a Nemo attraction...more then Tomorrowland, a Pixar attraction would fit better in Fantasyland anyway and now the opportunity is gone.

    Management mistake? Short sited future planning? What do you think?

  2. #2

    • Banned User
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,769
    Quote Originally Posted by s8ntmark
    I just thought of it....

    I was kind of happy and self assured that WE (ie Disneylanders) would not only be keeping our subs but getting a (hopefully) cool Nemo overlay where WDW just had their lagoon shuttered and filled in, HA!

    But then it hit me, what if the new Nemo theme is really cool, and it does really well over here...and they decided that it would be a good thing to bring over to WDW...they just filled in the most pefect location for a Nemo attraction...more then Tomorrowland, a Pixar attraction would fit better in Fantasyland anyway and now the opportunity is gone.

    Management mistake? Short sited future planning? What do you think?
    I am actually glad they filled it in, that means that they wont be a bunch of copiers and take our unique attraction.

  3. #3

    • Ursus H. Bear, ESQ
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    341
    Good point

  4. #4

    • Banned User
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,769
    It is the number 1 thing I hate about Disney these days and that is making clones of other attractions. It is plain lazy, cheap, and not innovative.

  5. #5

    • Circle of Ancients
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Paris, France / Los Angeles
    Posts
    38,886
    Blog Entries
    2
    Ah, but cost effective! Every time one park pays Imagineering to develop an attraction (even if its just sketches, not final blueprints), it saves another Disney park money if they can find a way to incorporate new developments at other Disney parks into their own resorts.

    Now, if they were smart they would each try to "best" each other by one upping the last guy: adding new effects and thrills to make thier version better.

    Then everyone wins, eventually the first park does a refurb and brings in new details. For example Disneyland CA could "steal" the dart scene from Tokyo's Indy and install a better scene with 3 D statues not the ones painted on the wall.

    Now, the DL subs can go grey (military) or yellow (explorer) or be modified to look DISNEYESQUE to look like DORI if they wanted to, with easy modificaions to the exterior of the torpedo shaped subs.

    How would you turn the Nautilus into anything else? My understanding is if you dont use the same ride vehicles, if you design new ones from the ground up, you have to follow ADA guidelines for wheelchairs to be able to board. So in FL it would have been more difficult to do a Nemo overlay even though the ride would be a better fit into Fantasyland over there than it is in Tomorrowland over here.

  6. #6

    • Banned User
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,769
    Quote Originally Posted by CaliforniaAdventurer
    Ah, but cost effective!
    That isnt what Disney is about at least that wasn't what Walt was about. Walt was about taking chances and spending money to make money.

  7. #7

    • Circle of Ancients
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Paris, France / Los Angeles
    Posts
    38,886
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Disneyfreak
    That isnt what Disney is about at least that wasn't what Walt was about. Walt was about taking chances and spending money to make money.
    If the cost of building new attractions go down 40% by "stealing", that's 40% more you can budget into the new version.

    Or you can build more rides more often. I say dont make the tourists crisscross the country then they spend more on airfare than at the parks.

    The whole reason for two resorts in the US is so each can serve one side of the country. If Chicago or Minneapolis werent so cold there'd be a Disney resort there somewhere too.

  8. #8

    • Behind the refurb walls..
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    7,943
    Blog Entries
    1
    You guys annoy me with the copying! You act like kidergardeners saying, they copied me! It's there company they can do what they want. It's not always easy for someone who lives by WDW to come to DL and have the chance to ride some cool ride! To me it sounds like you guys are just being greedy!






    ~ Here you leave today and enter the world of yesterday tomorrow and fantasy
    ~

  9. #9

    • the subs were cool maan
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    397
    But how could they have done it in WDW if they had the 20k nautilis subs? The 20k theme wouldnt mix well with (finding) Nemo since they have the captain nemo subs.

  10. #10

    • Banned User
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,634
    Looking in hindsight they should have brought the 20k version of the subs to Disenyland to match the Victorian theme of tommorowland'98 and give us a slightly fresher version of the subs and then given florida the nemo subs in fantasyland.

  11. #11

    • Circle of Ancients
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Paris, France / Los Angeles
    Posts
    38,886
    Blog Entries
    2
    The themes work better if they could be switched but didn't you guys hear me:

    Quote Originally Posted by CaliforniaAdventurer

    Now, the DL subs can go grey (military) or yellow (explorer) or be modified to look DISNEYESQUE to look like DORI if they wanted to, with easy modificaions to the exterior of the torpedo shaped subs.

    How would you turn the Nautilus into anything else? My understanding is if you dont use the same ride vehicles, if you design new ones from the ground up, you have to follow ADA guidelines for wheelchairs to be able to board. So in FL it would have been more difficult to do a Nemo overlay even though the ride would be a better fit into Fantasyland over there than it is in Tomorrowland over here.

  12. #12

    • Banned User
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,769
    Quote Originally Posted by Evan-500
    You guys annoy me with the copying! You act like kidergardeners saying, they copied me! It's there company they can do what they want. It's not always easy for someone who lives by WDW to come to DL and have the chance to ride some cool ride! To me it sounds like you guys are just being greedy!
    It is even more childish to say that it isnt fair that the other park has something unique and pout over it. Each park should be unique and that would help the Disney brand out by making each park different it would encourage people to travel and spend big bucks to see all new stuff at other parks.

  13. #13

    • Circle of Ancients
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Paris, France / Los Angeles
    Posts
    38,886
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Disneyfreak
    Each park should be unique and that would help the Disney brand out by making each park different it would encourage people to travel and spend big bucks to see all new stuff at other parks.
    Disney makes a lot more money when the cost of air travel isnt' a factor for a family of 4 or 5 or 6.

  14. #14

    • Minion
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Morva in the Land of Prydain
    Posts
    4,474
    ORDDU: My sisters and I were have already been talking amongst ourselves about how short sighted Disney World Management has become--over this same regard--filling in the sub lagoon at Fantasyland too soon. What if the Finding Nemo attraction IS popular--they will have made a move they could end up regretting.

    ORWEN: And, as for being worried about cloning something from another park--we'd rather have them do THAT, as opposed to what it looks like they're going to do in Florida, instead. For instance, the former sub lagoon is being turned into a character meet and greet area with no immediate plans for an attraction to go on all that vast land. Give us Finding Nemo ANY day over a wasted meet 'n greet area!! It's all a ploy to 'save' money and cheapen the guest's experience!

  15. #15

    • Banned User
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delaware...hopefully not for that much longer.
    Posts
    1,437
    I really miss 20k Lagoon at WDW. Yes filling it in was stupid, especially considering they are just putting a playground in there now.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Silly question about filling out paperwork
    By TrixieM in forum Break Room
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-25-2009, 05:39 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-05-2007, 10:43 AM
  3. Filling Theater Seats but Not Movie Jobs - L.A. Times, 10/15/06
    By disneytim in forum MiceChat News Archive
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-15-2006, 06:49 PM
  4. BD Bopper filling in tonight on Ikinky Radio!
    By BDBopper in forum Community Outpost
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-27-2006, 06:11 PM
  5. Filling/Feeling the Void...
    By dixilandgirl in forum MiceChat Main Lounge
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-20-2006, 10:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •