After reading over the viability of a 3rd gate thread, I started to wonder about DCA's own viability problem.
Maybe this is crazy, but is it possible that having DCA so convenient to the Disneyland gate possibly a negative?
For us park hoppers, it's no doubt a positive. But does such convenience cause us to rule out spending a full day at DCA because DL is right next door?
And if DCA were not right next to DL, do we all really believe DCA would be a ghost town? Would you really never visit it again?
Would people be more inclined to try and make a full day of DCA if it were more than walking distance from DL?
Do you think Disney would have invested more time, effort and money into DCA if it truly needed to depend on its own daily guests?
Am I just mad as a hatter??