So, out of curiosity, I thought I would check out the Paul Pressler entry on Wikipedia.com. The latest rendition of Paul Presslers wiki-fame reads a little too rosey for my own comfort level.
I will agree that the first submissions may not have been an unbiased report on Pressler's career, but the current entry is also FAR from unbiased IMO.
Take a look at the following link, which compares Wikipedia of January of 2006 on the left hand side of the page to the latest version, updated in February 2008 on the right. You will notice how all negative statements have been omitted and re-written in a far less critical manner.
I'm personally very bothered by this. Disneyland's reputation and quality suffered severely during these very unhappy years. Why shouldn't history remember Paul Pressler exactly for what he did and did not do?? What do you think?