These are all actually from another thread, but I think it's starting to go off-track and this topic has legs enough to just be on its own.^^
I think I'd probably like some of his drawings better if they didn't have that generic Disney coloring, it's true.
I love this!
The first part comes off a little bit like the OLC is limiting US creativity, which I don't think they have the power to do at all. They are a licensee. They don't even own the rights to Duffy, but they do have their own talent...and they have their pride. I want to be sure I'm reading it right. In the last part, it sounds like they were unwilling to just handover "creative control" for WDC to simply re-release Tokyo-designed costumes at cheaper prices like it did with other Duffy merchandise. That sounds plausible to me, and that doesn't really limit US creativity in any way. It just means if they want it to be great, they'll have to invest in making it so themselves.
Apparently Halloween was the first of these. Although, honestly, I think it's not fair to be too impressed with this yet, since it's still basically a copy of a Japanese design that was also copied by the US for 12". I'm excited to see what happens when Hong Kong really goes for it, though. I know some incredible artists there.
Now that's what I'm talking about!
Duffy teams in Hong Kong, Paris and Tokyo all pushing creative designs! This is really what I wanted from Paris and I'm happy to hear it's happening. This has always, always been my vision!
I don't know who Dara is...
We all envy your backstage access,^^ but I'm more hopeful after reading your post, at least for Hong Kong and Paris. The part about the US kinda sounds like they're trying to blame Tokyo for their lack of creativity, which, especially after looking at this "new" storybook, is absolutely freaking ridiculous! I wonder whose decision it was not to include Cape Cod nominally, though. I can see how OLC might want to protect Cape Cod as a location in TDS, but what is more likely to me is that WDC didn't want non-Japanese fans, particularly Americans, to think of "Duffy's hometown" being somewhere in Japan. I am so relieved to think that OLC artists had the clout to be treated like the creators/owners of Duffy, which is how that sounded, and how it is, no matter what the copyright says.^^
Yeah, I appreciate the consistent passion that all the Japanese artists demonstrably have for their heart-labored craft. I just wish I was able to know who they are like I know Monty and that "author" whose name escapes me at the moment...
I didn't know that, either. Hopefully we'll get photos soon!^^
Of course I don't know what Poohstraveler knows and I'm not even 100% sure I understand exactly what was meant. But I do know from many experiences that the image of the OLC "controlling" what WDC does is at the very least dramatically overstated and more likely totally inconceivable. They are a licensee who depend on Disney to run their business. OLC surely brings in revenue and severing that tie would be harmful to Disney politically, but Disney is the Big Cheese, make no mistake. What I think this means is that they did not lose control of their own designs in the negotiations to bring Duffy to a global audience, and I applaud them for it.This would also explain the Halloween and Christmas costumes, as well as the storybook. WDC wanted to just copy and paste, but probably sell at a lower price point. OLC said "No, that's ours and that's not how we roll!" So, the US team made just enough variations to get away with it. You know, the kind of thing they'd sue someone else for. Of course, that's all just speculation. I'm sure Poohstraveler can tell us more.*hint, hint*
I suppose Jessie Ward was kind enough to say she was "inspired by the hangtags." Yeah...I remembered her name.
This is from yet another thread, but I also think it fits better here:
I'm not sure I understood what Poohstraveler wrote properly, but based on many, many interactions with CMs, office staff and entertainment planners here, as well as knowing some people at Disney Japan (not OLC-affiliated, but a subsidiary of WDC), I strongly-nigh-completely doubt that OLC has even the remotest inkling of the power to tell Disney they can't spend exactly as much talent and capital on whatever the heck they'd like and to whatever extent they wish. It is a wholly implausible concept and if someone at Disney said as much, they were lying.
If OLC had that kind of power over Disney or even over Duffy, they would own the name and character design, too. If they could and if their modus operandi and motivation was to limit other companies'/artists' creative power, don't you think they'd have "©Oriental Land Company" on Duffy products - at least in Japan even? If theywere gonnacould tell the US what it can and cannot produce, don't you think they'd also insist on having their own artists credited or at least the Company's name mentioned when US artists are doing knock-offs of their work and capitalizing on their investment in an idea the US threw away?
The notion that the OLC has tied Disney's hands and stopped them from being able to produce their "grand vision" of Duffy is patently absurd to the point of laughing out loud, at least as I can understand it, so I doubt that's precisely what Poohstraveler meant. Hopefully we'll get a clarification update from PT soon.^^



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

I love this!
Now that's what I'm talking about!


Bringing the Love since January 10, 2011





Bookmarks