4/24: Strollers & Spreadsheets

[CUatDL]

Originally Posted by KevinYee

Ah, but you're assuming I titled the article. I didn't. I sent it in with the title of "Marginal Returns", and it got changed around.

But that aside (and I do like the new name better anyway), I'm not convinced that the new name for the article is an invitation to debate stroller policy. If anything, it's an invitation to *alter* the existing debate on stroller policy to include the spreadsheeting effect.

You and Al have both been around long enough to know better.

I'm calling BS on this one.

Just MHO, YMMV

CU@DL

Andy

[KevinYee]

Your call, of course, Andy. But please know that I would never intentionally provoke the kind of debate that impugns people or even the kind that hurts feelings. I like thought-provoking debate, but the healthy kind that steers clear of emotionality.

[flynnibus]

I think Disney is the one who brought 'strollers' into it all. There is no way they'd jack prices up 50% overnight and not provide ANY soft-story/explanation on their hardships introduced externally if the reasoning was due to external factors. This means the changes were probably internally motivated - either to alter usage or change operational costs

[mdove10]

Kevin, I think your post #71 says it all. The strollers are but a symptom, the grater issue is the declination of experience. Accounteers should be functionaries of the company, not the primary drivers! We need "park people" not business people.
BTW, the A and B tickets provided not only experiences, but kept the lines at D and E's shorter and added to the park.