My current job gives me 30 minutes for lunch. This is the first job I've ever had in the 12 years I've been working that I've not had a 1 hour lunch? So it's a bit new to me.
I disagree with 30 minute lunch. I mean, take today for instance. It took me about 20 minutes to drive to the Subway (love Subway) get my food then drive back to the office. Leaving a little under 10 minutes to eat.
Of course, the up side is that 30 minute lunch encourages bringing lunch from home, which saves $$$.
But what also gets me is that if there is a lunch meeting or birthday lunch or something and it goes OVER 30 minutes...I have to stay over however long the lunch was. Even if its a business meeting!
Bottom line. I really don't think 30 minutes is enough for lunch.