Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1

    • is FIERCE!
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    somewhere Major
    Posts
    8,004
    Blog Entries
    4

    Paranoia for Fun and Profit- Slate.com 5/3/05

    How Disney and Michael Moore cleaned up on Fahrenheit 9/11.

    Michael Moore had a problem. By the end of April 2004, he'd finished making Fahrenheit 9/11 but had no American distributor. Mel Gibson's Icon Productions rejected the project back in April 2003. (Moore claims he had a signed contract before Gibson acquiesced to White House pressure. Icon executives deny any such contract existed.) Moore then went to Harvey Weinstein at Miramax. Weinstein agreed to back the movie and signed a contract with Moore to acquire the rights. But in order to distribute the movie, Weinstein still needed the approval of his superiors at Disney. Although he does not discuss this publicly, Weinstein's contract explicitly prohibits Miramax, a wholly owned subsidiary of Disney, from distributing any film that's vetoed by the Disney CEO. When then-CEO Michael Eisner exercised his veto in May 2003, Miramax, though it still held the rights to the film, could not distribute Fahrenheit 9/11.

    By the time Eisner told Weinstein of his decision, the Miramax head had already given Moore $6 million from Miramax's loan account. Weinstein agreed that this advance was to be "bridge financing" that he would recover when he sold off the film's distribution rights. To make sure there was no misunderstanding, Disney's Senior Executive Vice President Peter Murphy, who was also at the meeting, wrote Weinstein a letter on May 12, 2003, affirming that this money was "bridge financing" and that Weinstein had agreed to dispose of Miramax's interest in the film.
    Read the whole article- trust me- it is interesting........
    Check out the News Forum for the latest news with a Micechat twist!



    Do you MiceChat?
    Help support the site you love:
    -Visit the MiceChat store
    Make a donation with one of the boxes at the bottom of the page

    DMCA for life, yo.
    MCDA- Bringin' sexyback, one pound at a time.


  2. #2

    •   
    • Minion
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    In a 3D movie theater
    Posts
    4,834
    Quote Originally Posted by dramaqueen
    Read the whole article- trust me- it is interesting........

    I know it is... What really is the most interesting is the Politics of the Disney Company as a whole... Eisner is a known supporter of the Clinton Presidency...

    I don't think he objected to the content of the film, but rather that it was a political film funded by a Company where he is CEO, the Chairman of the Board was a Democratic leader of the Senate...

    The last thing you need as an investor is the idea that Disney is playing Politics... That was the meat behind the veto...

    But it still doesn't clear the issue of why CBN is allowed air time for the 700 Club on ABC Family... It's content is not just religiously conservative but very politically conservative.

    Maybe it supposedly strikes a balance of sorts, I don't know...
    Check out my other blog:

Similar Threads

  1. Paramount unveils initial Blu-ray slate
    By ALIASd in forum MiceChat News Archive
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-29-2008, 08:12 PM
  2. ABC unveils unscripted summer slate
    By ALIASd in forum MiceChat News Archive
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-31-2008, 04:46 PM
  3. This Fall's Film Slate...
    By cellarhound in forum MiceChat News Archive
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-30-2006, 05:52 PM
  4. We're Soaring! We're Flying! - MSN Slate - 3/31/06
    By disneytim in forum MiceChat News Archive
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-03-2006, 09:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •