Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 47 of 47
  1. #46

    • Vegetarian Disneylander
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(

    Re: Why Disney won't re-release ''Song of the South'' from its vaults -3/4/07

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynn, Renaissance Woman View Post
    SotS takes place *after* the Civil War. Uncle Remus is *not* a slave!

    The movie shows the wisdom and caring of Uncle Remus against the short sightedness and self-centeredness of the parents and family of the young boy. Uncle Remus shows these folk what they are missing by ignoring the boy and his feelings.

    Have you seen the film?

    Yes, I have seen the film. Australian TV was actually showing it for quite some time on the Disney Channel in the last few years, when they were less uptight about appeasing the Disney Mothership, although I'm sure word has come down from on high to stop.

    But you actually help my point. SotS is not about slavery, we are both agreed on that. There is some debate as to the time frame of the story, but the wrap-around segment is considered racially insensitive because of the stereotypical 'Uncle Tom' depiction of Uncle Remus. The NAACP decried the film because of the perpetuation of the stereotypical 'idyllic master-slave relationship,' and the NAACP is right in doing so.

    Quote Originally Posted by soulquarian
    Having a "leading member of the African American community" introduce the film is offensive to me and my intelligence. As if to say if Bill Cosby has a little introduction, it will ease some of the tension.

    If the Taliban made an animated family movie about the 9/11 attacks and prefaced it with Julie Andrews, would that make you feel better about the movie?
    I'm sorry, but with all due respect that is a stretch of a comparison. While I tend to agree that perpetuating a racist stereotype is just as bad as a terrorist attack - after all, it is racist stereotypes on both sides that have perpetuated this war of terror in the first place - it is all about context. When World Trade Centre and United 93 came out in the cinema, people were already crying that it was 'too soon' and insensitive. I maintain that it was. However, members of the victims families approved the films, both films shared their own measure of success and Paul Greengrass was even nominated for best director at the Academy Awards this year for United 93.

    Now, I didn't necessarily say I supported the method of delivery - after all, I did put on my Devil's Advocate hat to make the point if you go back and read my original post - but you know this is exactly the kind of thing Disney would do if they ever decided to release the film. They'd stick it on a special edition; contextualise the film with an intro by James Earl Jones (already having a Disney connection) and sell millions of copies. It may never happen, but you know the eyes of Disney marketing are already lit up with dollar signs and have anticipated every possible release of the film.

    We live in an age where films like Norbit - which in my humble opinion perpetuate "African American stereotypes" just as badly as SotS ever did - yet make money at the box office. After all, how many films use the 'sassy black woman who men are intimidated by because they can't handle "all that"'? Hip-hop records sell millions, and the majority of mainstream hip-hop perpetuates the 'pimps and hos' image of the community, and is additionally sexist towards women by objectifying them.

    In my mind, releasing a copy of SotS within the proper context is less damaging than these other activities. As we are doing everything we can to forget the past, by pretending the film never happened, we are forgetting a part of what was negative about our attitudes of the past. Forgetting our mistakes and covering them up is just as bad as glorifying the negative attitudes of a few misguided individuals. Regardless of the racist depictions in the film - and yes, I do believe that the depictions of Uncle Remus probably fall within the racist category - the film is an historical document of the Disney studios as well as being a technically great piece of art. Like my comparison with Birth of a Nation, even if we disagree with its politics, we can still appreciate the technical artistry of the film.
    I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out. - Bill Hicks

  2. #47

    • Minion
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Oct 2006

    Re: Why Disney won't re-release ''Song of the South'' from its vaults -3/4/07

    Quote Originally Posted by TifaOnACloud View Post
    Is it really that hard to simply view the film as a product of it's time and not think that it advocates racism in the modern age? It's a classic that deserves recognition for it's strengthes, not derision for it's weaknesses.
    "Happiness is a state of mind...." Walt Disney

    "You may not realize it when it happens, but a kick in the teeth may be the best thing in the world for you." Walt Disney


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-17-2009, 11:12 PM
  2. Any update on the release of Song of the South on dvd?
    By GUYNYC in forum MiceChat News Archive
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-30-2008, 07:19 PM
  3. Could Bob Iger release 'Song of the South' after all?
    By OogieBoogie in forum MiceChat News Archive
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-01-2007, 02:17 PM
  4. Song of the South release - Fall 2006
    By BigPigletFan in forum MiceChat News Archive
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-27-2005, 04:02 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts