Breck Eisner is hoping to make a sequal to themoney losing "Sahara". The original picture cost $130 million to make and took in a world wide total of only $119 million. according to comingsoon.net Breck is excited about making a sequal (based on how well DVD sells go of the original).
I have to ask... Who thinks that is a good idea? Are we making movies for the sake of making movies? or do we want them to be quality? I have a hard time believing in a young director whos dad ruined almost everything sacred about the most virginal brand in hollywood!!!