There isn't any need to reply with a "It will never happen" we are speaking hypothetically here. If the announcement was made and Waterworld/Gibson was the space for Potter what would your reaction be?
The reason I'm wondering is because I'm hearing both sides over the internet, some people seem to think it will never happen because of how high Waterworld is rated in the park (but seriously, against what, the Animal Show? The Blues Brothers or Special Effects shows?). Other people seem to think the show has run its course.
Regardless of personal feelings for WW, no one can deny that Potter will pack USH to capacity in a way Waterworld no longer can, and as much as any of us dislike the idea, the almighty dollar will rule the decision-making from here on out.
So the question is do you think taking out WW is a bad idea (because you love it, or just hate to see one more attraction get taken out of a park that already has so few to begin with) or do you like the idea (perhaps WW has run its course, or you just want to see Potter.)?
The persistent rumor seems to be the removal of either Waterworld or Shrek, so whats your opinion on it?