Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1

    • former CM
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    S. Cal. via Milw. & Madison Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,070

    Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    LINK: Prosecutors take on Disney princess kit | UTSanDiego.com

    I don't know who gets the $225,000,
    and I wonder if Disney even knew what this product contained. (I guess they should have.)
    Are they still selling this in other states even though it will cause some customers to equate Disney with "rip off"?
    Will they continue to do business with the company that produced this?
    Last edited by jcruise86; 11-16-2012 at 12:13 PM.

  2. #2

    • Sshhh, being very quiet
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    S. California
    Posts
    16,597

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    I'm sorry but I fail to see where the deception was...

    The unopened box:
    Name:  princess_cover_t620.JPG
Views: 518
Size:  68.4 KB

    The opened box:

    Name:  princess_inside_t620.JPG
Views: 518
Size:  66.3 KB

    Everything that was being show in the unopened package is in the open one. Is the complaint that there are empty slots?

    Also it says on the package what the box contains and it looks like all of that is there.

    This just sounds like a spoiled kid didn't get what she thought she was getting and mommy and daddy saw $$ signs.

    The girl was crushed when she opened the container to find it empty beyond the beads she could see through the labeling on the container’s lid.

    And when my kid complained I would explain the empty slots were for holding the beads and projects separate.

    That is my take on it. I'm not a bracelet maker so if I am missing something here please let me know.

  3. #3

    • Minion
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,165

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    Very silly indeed. It says right on the packaging how many beads are in the box.
    Jeff Wayne







  4. #4

    • Team Hail HYDRA
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    2741 Buena Vista St.
    Posts
    1,240

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    Quote Originally Posted by clara View Post
    And when my kid complained I would explain the empty slots were for holding the beads and projects separate.
    me too
    i sad what people will now to make some $$$$$

    Go visit my theme park website!!! http://kolbykonnection.com


  5. #5

    • former CM
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    S. Cal. via Milw. & Madison Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,070

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    Thanks for posting the photo. So who did get the money?

    I do think it was packaged to mislead, which is uncool to do to kids, though you could argue it provided a good teaching moment. I just hate Disney to be seen as the sleazy capitalists to be wary of. The empty boxes just looked wrong to me, but blasting Disney on the internet seems more appropriate to me than involving the government. I would like to see ads aimed at small kids (especially for unhealthy foods) outlawed as they are in some other countries.

  6. #6

    • Knight that says Nee!!
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Northern CA
    Posts
    2,647

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    It is only "packaged to mislead" if you call misleading the same as expecting people to have common sense and basic powers of observation. This is a typical example of parents failing to be parents and rather scapegoating others (in this case a company) for that failure and then attempting to profit on it.

  7. #7

    • New Member
    • Offline

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    927

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    The parent didn't sue, the lawyers did on their behalf. The money is supposed to be going toward prohibiting future "fraudulent practices" through the legal system.

    Also, Disney didn't get hit with the lawsuit, the toy manufacturer did. Disney simply licensed their images and properties to them to produce the product in question. Whether or not Disney actually knew what was going on with the toy is (as far as I can tell from the article) unknown.

  8. #8

    • Member
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    541

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    Personally I would think there would be some sort of check and balance with Disney licensing.
    For the love of Disney....

  9. #9

    • Seasick
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    3,191

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    I can see where that would be irritating as a consumer, but it's not uncommon.

    Is it now a requirement that the entire contents of a product be visible? What if you couldn't see any of the contents? This packaging is misleading, but what next? A box of candy has to be translucent so you can see how many are actually in the box?

    Lego in particular does a very good job using over sized boxes and imagery to make it look like you're getting more than you actually do.
    My Micechat cruise trip report, Part 1:http://micechat.com/14795-disney-wonder/

  10. #10

    • Senior Minion
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    8,890

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    No question about it, that box is classic deceptive packaging. The box is more than 50% air -- which fact is conveniently covered by the artwork. "Fillers" and oversize packaging that disguise the fillers are common techniques of false advertising.
    "With the acquisition of Marvel and now of Lucasfilm,
    Disney may have finally found the grail. You don't need
    imagination or art. All you need is a brand."

    - Neil Gabler


  11. #11

    •   
    • Banned User
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    752

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    It may feel deceptive but if it contains what the packaging said it would contain, then it was honest. If anything it contains all of that plus storage compartments.

    Normally I side with the defrauded consumer because no one likes a cheat, except what was advertised here was honest so.... you know, get over it. ....or show your kid that in this self-entitled society you should be able to sue anyone if you find yourself disappointed. .....at the clearly printed truth on the cover of the box you're looking right at.

    ---------- Post added 11-19-2012 at 11:31 AM ----------

    Come to think of it, if we're going to go there let's sue every snack food that has air in their bags.

    Oh wait...

    Product Packaging: Consumer Reports Investigates

  12. #12

    • will-o-the-whip
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    730

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    This is classic deceptive advertising, the shape and placement of imagery on the box is designed to fool, and the courts are especially protective when it comes to children's products since they are an unsophisticated audience.
    Here's another example with an inflatable water toy that specifies it dimensions, but the imagery on the box is clearly intended to deceive:

    How Photoshop Ruined This Poor Girl's Summer

  13. #13

    •   
    • Banned User
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    752

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    Well now I see that one completely different. The beads mentioned above are the size they appear to be through the window, and it includes all the bits it said it would. There's no lie there.

    But this thing you just posted, about the waterslide? Yeah, that's just total BS. That's deceptive photoshop to shamelessly fool people into expecting one thing but getting another. I'm in total agreement about THAT being fraud.

  14. #14

    • Not here to help
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,123

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    Quote Originally Posted by clara View Post
    I'm sorry but I fail to see where the deception was...

    The unopened box:
    Name:  princess_cover_t620.JPG
Views: 518
Size:  68.4 KB

    The opened box:

    Name:  princess_inside_t620.JPG
Views: 518
Size:  66.3 KB

    .
    Its like Walt Disney World
    The world according me: http://www.youtube.com/user/TimmyME

  15. #15

    • Sshhh, being very quiet
    • Offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    S. California
    Posts
    16,597

    Re: Disney fined for rip-off princess toy

    Quote Originally Posted by indianajack View Post
    This is classic deceptive advertising, the shape and placement of imagery on the box is designed to fool, and the courts are especially protective when it comes to children's products since they are an unsophisticated audience.
    Here's another example with an inflatable water toy that specifies it dimensions, but the imagery on the box is clearly intended to deceive:

    How Photoshop Ruined This Poor Girl's Summer
    Clearly...this and this:

    Name:  original.jpg
Views: 263
Size:  71.4 KB


    Are photoshopped. I mean in the picture above...the box pictured pool looks at least a foot longer than the actual pool!
    Last edited by clara; 11-21-2012 at 02:52 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. [Video] Walt Disney World Summer Nightastic Commercial rip off
    By CinderellaStory in forum Disneyland Resort
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-03-2010, 05:16 PM
  2. [Other] Biggest rip off at Disney.
    By cromag in forum Disneyland Resort
    Replies: 105
    Last Post: 11-22-2009, 11:42 PM
  3. [News] Cheesy Swiss Corporate Officer Fined For Euro Disney Hoax
    By Ride Warrior in forum Disneyland Paris
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-08-2009, 11:59 AM
  4. Disney Music for IPOD
    By Titanfreak46 in forum Disneyland Resort
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-09-2005, 10:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •