I recently read a glowing review of WDW printed in the Chicago Times. Among the bullet points I found this one interesting criticism.....
Obviously the incoherent laser show of Mickey vs. the forces of evil must be Fantasmic! And he lists it as a draw back. Wow. is the show that bad? I have seen both Fantasmic!s and I definitely favor Disneyland's of Hollywood Studio's. I also have criticized WDW for creating a show that was "good enough" if you had not seen Disneyland's, which I suspect is the case for a very solid majority of the crowds who view the one at Hollywood Studios. Comments just like this one make me wonder..... is Fantasmic! just not this authors cup of tea, or would he have been impressed if he had seen Disneyland's version? hummmmm
- Too many highlights to list – those tigers, great 3-D shows, good food. The drawbacks – a few tired attractions, two of which broke down while we were on them, one incoherent laser extravaganza which locked Mickey Mouse in a Manichean struggle with the forces of evil.
On another point the article did not say, I am absolutely curious to know, what were the "few tired attractions" he eluded to. hummmmmm again.