
Originally Posted by
Werner Weiss
I can come up with a hundred ways in which the city of EPCOT could have failed.
The question, however, is whether the city of EPCOT could have succeeded if the management commitment had been there.
Imagine a city of EPCOT built along the lines of what Walt Disney envisioned in the 1960s. Then imagine a process of continually updating the city of EPCOT with involvement by corporations eager to show off their latest innovations. Imagine a place that's so desirable as a place to live that there's a long waiting list of residents who want to live there for several years — even if they must then move to make way for new residents.
I'm still not 100% sure the the city of EPCOT would have worked, but after reading the manuscript for Sam's book, I can now see how it could have been a success.
In any case, today's Disney would be a very different company if the emphasis in Florida had been to build a city rather than what was built instead. I'm not sure that pointing to what Disney Parks & Resorts management has done with the theme park of Epcot -- good and bad -- can be used as evidence of how the city of EPCOT would have fared.
Bookmarks